Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Oblation or Obligation? A Canonical Ambiguity

Bibliographic Data

ID12033010
AuthorsJohn Doran (0000-0003-4394-4493, Royal Holloway University of London, corresponding author)
Year1994
Volume31
Pages127-141
Publication date1994-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Church History (BOOK_SERIES)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0424-2084 • E-ISSN: 2059-0644
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0424208400012833
OpenAlexW2329191146
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

The practice of oblation, the giving of children to a religious community to be brought up and educated, is as old as monasticism itself. Oblation was a means by which parents were able to dispose of unwanted offspring and be fairly confident that they would be cared for by others. However, there were never any clear guidelines laid down by the Church with respect to oblation, and the confusion over the status of an oblate was never to be satisfactorily settled. Even the great effort put into removing ambiguities in canon law in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries failed to clarify the technicalities of oblation. This was because there was no agreement on the nature of oblation from the start. The practice of the Eastern Church with respect to oblation is best summed up by St Basil the Great, in his Regulae Fusius Tractatae . He took oblation for granted, noting that a child was easily moulded to the religious life, and stipulated no minimum age at which a child should be received, but he did insist that those under the care of their parents were to be received before witnesses. More importantly, Basil was anxious that a child oblate should be questioned strictly when he reached the age of sixteen or seventeen as to whether he wished to be professed. He then had to demonstrate perseverance in the religious life and was only to be professed after much pleading. This final profession was irrevocable. Clearly the tradition of the Church was in favour of the oblation of children, but the giving of a child was not considered a definitive act. Certainly with St Basil we can see that the abbot of a community was to have the final say as to whether or not a child oblate should be professed when he came of age. This was very much in the spirit of early monasticism. The abbot was not to be forced to retain unsuitable monks in his monastery

Ambiguity · Confusion · Greatness · Obligation · Pleading · Political science · Precept · Psychoanalysis · Remarriage · Sociology · History · Law · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Theology and Canon Law Studies

  • John Doran (1966–2012)

    Open Access•Brenda Bolton•Studies in Church History•2014

  • The Monastic Order in England

    Open Access•Dom David Knowles•Monastic Order in England•1963

  • Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century

    Robert Benson, Robert D Benson et al.•Renaissance and Reformation•2009

Citations per year0.08
Citation span2014 - 2014 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae