The EU counter-radicalisation strategy as “business as usual”? How European political routine resists radical religion
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12047325 |
|---|---|
| Autores | François Foret (0000-0002-7129-5462, Cevipol/Institute for European Studies, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium), Margarita Markoviti (0000-0003-3783-3738, Cevipol/Institute for European Studies, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 42 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 547-563 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-11-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of European Integration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0703-6337 • E-ISSN: 1477-2280 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07036337.2019.1687462 |
| OpenAlex | W2986274451 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
The emergence of an EU counter-radicalisation (CR) strategy has challenged the usual reluctance of European institutions to tackle value-loaded issues. This article examines whether this new policy alters EU policy-making and especially its approach to religion. It illuminates, first, the triggers of such a CR strategy (traumatic events, popular expectations and international influences). It then shows how the shift of CR from foreign to domestic EU affairs leads to the acknowledgement of religion as a multi-dimensional phenomenon and to the involvement of a greater number of political, bureaucratic and civil society actors. Still, usual patterns of EU public action apply to reduce the controversial potential of CR: circumscription to a legal and bureaucratic logic, institutional burden-sharing, delegation to member states and civil society, hollowing of the normative content of religion. In conclusion, CR has sparked a new EU policy field but has not radically shaken the routine of European politics
Acknowledgement · Bureaucracy · Civil society · Delegation · Economics · European integration · European union · International trade · Law and economics · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Law · Public Administration · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Overview of RelEP2 (2019–2024) findings. Is there a politicisation of and through religion in the European Parliament
God, [political] family… and Europe? The selective resilience of religion in shaping the work of Italian members of the European Parliament
Fundamental right or political value? The evolution of ‘freedom of religion or belief’ in the European Union’s legitimation and public action
A republic uncomfortable with what comes from above (God or Europe)
The Changing Agenda of Societal Security
The Coordination of the European Union
The Council of Ministers
Radicalisation
Religion and Politics in the European Union
Understanding Terror Networks
Prévention de la radicalisation et déradicalisation
Counter-radicalisation policy across Europe
Security governance and the limits of depoliticisation
Countering terrorism and radicalisation
New challenge, old solutions? Religion and counter-radicalisation in the European Parliament and the radicalisation awareness network
A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation
La «scène terroriste
Policing Strategies against Islamic Terrorism in the UK after 9/11
Security and secularization in International Relations
EU counterterrorism strategy
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,8 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |