The Treaty-Making Revolution of the Nineteenth Century
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12050254 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edward Keene (North-West State Technical University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 475-500 |
| Publication date | 2012-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0707-5332 • E-ISSN: 1949-6540 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07075332.2012.675224 |
| OpenAlex | W2071293951 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
This article presents a descriptive statistical analysis of patterns of treaty-making from 1650 to 1914, suggesting that there was a revolution in the practice during the nineteenth century. At the most general level, it charts the dramatic increase in treaty-making activity, showing that this began no earlier than the final decade of the eighteenth century, and highlighting in particular the steady increase from roughly the 1830s to the 1860s as a key phase in the transformation of treaty-making practice. The article then examines variations in the activity of different types of treaty-maker. First, it looks at the treaty-making profiles of selected great powers, and confirms that in general great powers were more active than lesser powers, but also shows that some great powers found it hard to shake off their peripheral status within the network of treaties. Secondly, the article examines the participation of European, American, Asian, African and Middle Eastern States, and shows that while Europeans were clear leaders in the practice, we cannot treat the increase in treaty-making activity as a purely intra-European, or even Euro-American phenomenon. Finally, the article compares bilateral and multilateral treaty-making, arguing that while the latter does show some increase, particularly over the second half of the nineteenth century, it was actually decreasing as a proportion of total treaty-making activity, which raises questions about why multilateralism did not become more commonplace
Economics · Making-of · Multilateralism · Political science · Politics · Treaty · American Constitutional Law and Politics · European Political History Analysis · International Law and Aviation · Law
Growing intensity in the fifteenth century
If not Weber, then what?
Absolutism, bureaucracy, and eighteenth-century fiscal-military states
Constitutional officialdom
Twelfth-century feudal officialdom
Weber’s scorecard
Patrimonialism and ninth-century government
A Theory of World Politics
Religion and Diplomacy
Seeking capture, resisting seizure
Weber's Scorecard
France among the Most-Favored Nations
Understanding Multilateral Treaty-Making as Constitutive Practice
The league of nations as an imperial assemblage
Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East and North Africa under the AKP
Manufacturing International Law
État de littérature. L'histoire des relations internationales aujourd'hui
Writing Multilateral Trade Rules in the League of Nations
The Birth of the Cultural Treaty in Europe's Age of Crisis
A Muslim Dualism? Inter-Imperial History and Austria-Hungary in Ottoman Thought, 1867–1921
In search of Paulus Vladimiri
Beneath Sovereignty
Customary International Law
Unbundling the brand
A Liberal Peace
The Social Sources of Geopolitical Power
| Unique citing works | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.17 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2024 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 26 |