Undoing the right to the city
World Cup investments and informal settlements in Fortaleza, Brazil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12065110 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clarissa F Sampaio Freitas (0000-0001-9268-5745, Federal University of Fortaleza, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 953-969 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-13 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Urban Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0735-2166 • E-ISSN: 1467-9906 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07352166.2017.1328974 |
| OpenAlex | W2742294549 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 18 |
In the Global South, the notion of the right to the city has increasingly been used to challenge the effects of uneven development on vulnerable informal residents. Yet, under a neoliberal spatial regime, acknowledging rights of informal residents does not necessarily lead to increasing access to the opportunities that cities produce. The article documents a contradictory process of, simultaneously, institutionalization of rights and implementation of profit-driven urban investments associated with 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil. It is based on local-level, case-specific analysis of a dispute around the mega-event mobility investments and the demands of residents of Lagamar—a low-income, informal community in Fortaleza—adopting participant observation methods during a 3-year field research period. The case illustrates how Brazilian right to the city policies have gone beyond the mere recognition of land rights of informal residents, yet they have fallen short of addressing the needs of the urban poor, highlighting the role of mega-event investments in this process. The contradiction of simultaneously expanding and eroding the rights of the urban poor in Brazil has given room for manipulative state practices that I have called “undoing the right to the city.”
Archaeology · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Economy · Geography · Human settlement · Informal settlements · Undoing · Psychology · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance
Genealogy of the gray spaces discourse in contemporary urban planning
Legacy and urban regeneration
Projetos de transportes e conflito urbano
Transport projects and urban conflict
Can public–private partnerships help achieve the right to the city in Brazil? The case of Casa Paulista program in São Paulo
Historicizing Latin American urban politics and governments
The politics of police violence
Technologies of inclusion in the frontier of urban renewal
Problematizing street vending
Gaps in urban planning
Participatory governance in China
Reading Variegated Dispossession in an Asian Megacity
Insurgent planning
The role of self-organized transportation systems in Quito’s urban resilience
The right to the city
The contradictions of participatory planning
Rightful squatting
Something went wrong”
Guiding public policy in gray spaces
Scoping land tenure security for the poor and low-income urban dwellers from a spatial justice lens
Paradigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning
Preserving the (right kind of) city
Acessibilidade e mobilidade nos processos de reassentamento involuntário de famílias em Belo Horizonte
Housing Beyond the Metropolis
The Informal American City
A Poverty of Rights
Urban Informality
Cities for People, Not for Profit
Produção Habitacional na Região Metropolitana de Fortaleza na década de 2000
On urban reform, rights and planning challenges in the Brazilian metropolis
Discourses of land allocation and natural property rights
Cities for people, not for profit
Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents
This is no longer the city I once knew”. Evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi
Possible Worlds
Urban Informality
New Globalism, New Urbanism
Rethinking Land Struggle in the Postindustrial City
Ilegalidade e degradação em Fortaleza
| Citations per year | 3.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |