Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Betting on children at risk

Actors’ views on the introduction of social impact bonds in the French field of “childhood in danger”

Bibliographic Data

ID12065183
AuthorsElen Riot (0000-0003-4566-0996, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume42
Issue6
Pages856-891
Publication date2020-06-30
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Urban Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0735-2166 • E-ISSN: 1467-9906
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07352166.2020.1758119
OpenAlexW3039838262
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited32

Social impact bonds (SIBs) were recently introduced in France as a result of the creation of a state label. A set of promises were associated with the bonds allowing experimental projects to test new methods in dealing with social risk. Social entrepreneurs offered to pioneer them and engage in social innovation. Yet the device immediately triggered questions about the benefits of this type of public−private partnership and the compatibility of the welfare system with social finance. Empirically, it had already been tested abroad, with mixed results. Theoretically, some assumptions to help modelize social risk proved debatable. This paper documents key actors’ views on SIBs in terms of their present and foreseeable effects. Its specific subfield is that of children’s services. Its main contribution is dual. It first consists of identifying what type of arguments and positions work better to promote SIBs in France. Secondly, it points to several forms of decoupling between discourse and practices caused by the superior success of moderate and relatively vague descriptions of SIBs as a set of promises, prefigurative of a major restructuration of the field

Actuarial science · Bond · Business · Field (mathematics · General partnership · Normative · Political science · Public relations · Set (abstract data type · Social risk · Social Welfare · Sociology · Welfare · Community Development and Social Impact · Computer Science · Law · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Social Sciences and Governance · Finance

  • New public management marketizers versus Neo-Weberian state modernizers? Institutional configurations of social impact bond utilization among 18 OECD countries

    Jesse Hajer, Bin Chen•Public Management Review•2024

  • At a cost

    Open Access•Simon Demuynck, Wouter Van Dooren•Australian Journal of Public…•2023

  • Social Entrepreneurship

    M Tina Dacin, Peter A Dacin et al.•Organization Science•2011

  • Private finance for public goods

    Mildred E Warner•Journal of Economic Policy Reform•2013

  • Pricing the priceless child

    Viviana A Rotman Zelizer, Viviana A Zelizer•Pricing the priceless child•1981

  • Tva and the Grass Roots

    Philip Selznick•Tva and the Grass Roots•1984

  • A Theory of Fields

    Neil Fligstein, Doug Mcadam•A theory of fields•2012

  • (Not) Valuing Care

    Mildred E Warner•Feminist Economics•2009

  • Narratives of Promise, Narratives of Caution

    Open Access•Alec Fraser, Stefanie Tan et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2018

  • Social impact bonds

    Neil Mchugh, Stephen Sinclair et al.•Journal of Poverty and Social…•2013

  • A framework for social investment strategies

    Open Access•Jon Kvist•Comparative European Politics•2014

  • Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe

    Open Access•Janelle A Kerlin•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2006

  • The razor’s edge

    Allison E Tse, Mildred E Warner•Journal of Urban Affairs•2018

  • The Uneven Distribution of Market Solutions for Public Goods

    Mildred E Warner, Mildred Warner et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2002

  • Regional Economic Development and Child Care

    Mildred E Warner, Susan Prentice•Journal of Urban Affairs•2012

  • How planners deal with uncomfortable knowledge

    Bent Flyvbjerg•Cities•2013

  • Privatization and urban governance

    Open Access•Mildred E Warner•Cities•2012

  • Financialisation of Valuation

    Open Access•Eve Chiapello•Human Studies•2015

  • The three worlds of welfare capitalism

    Gøsta Esping-Andersen•The three worlds of welfare…•1990

  • Beyond the market versus planning dichotomy

    Amir Hefetz, Mildred E Warner et al.•Local Government Studies•2007

  • On the transformation of children at-risk into an investment proposition

    Open Access•Daniel Neyland•The Sociological Review•2018

  • Household Life-Cycle Stages, Transitions, and Product Expenditures

    Robert E Wilkes•Journal of Consumer Research•1995

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae