Transport Legacy of the Olympic Games, 1992–2012
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12065760 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eva Kassens-Noor (0000-0002-4311-7239, Michigan State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 393-416 |
| Publication date | 2012-07-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Urban Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0735-2166 • E-ISSN: 1467-9906 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00626.x |
| OpenAlex | W2120225561 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 32 |
Legacy planning in preparation for the Olympic Games has significantly grown in importance for host cities and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) because of wasteful investments for some previous Games. Since the late 1990s, the IOC has actively sought to prevent such overspending through a Transfer of Knowledge program, in which valuable lessons are passed from one host city to the next. This paper analyzes the transport legacies of the Olympic Games, using original archive material and interviews with key decision-makers in five cities. While previous research into the effects of the Olympic Games on host cities suggests that infrastructural legacies are place-specific, the main argument of this paper is that the transport legacies of the Olympic Games are much more uniform across the host cities. Even though host cities’ transport systems were intrinsically different pre-Olympics, the author finds that similar features of Olympic transport systems, developed through the Transfer of Knowledge program, produced similar legacies. In explaining the creation of transport legacies through Olympics-motivated drivers, the author suggests the Olympics might trigger similar transport developments in future host cities. Therefore, city planners can use Olympic transport features as powerful catalysts to accelerate their urban and transport plans
Argument (complex analysis · Business · Host (biology · Political science · Regional science · Sociology · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sports, Gender, and Society
Planning beyond 2032
Cancel culture
Short-term gains and long-term challenges to learning from mega-event planning in the city of Genoa
Knowledge management in sport mega-events
Boston’s Olympic bid and the evolving urban politics of event-led development
How mega-events capture their hosts
Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games
Olympic Technologies
Country Marketing and Planning Implications of the European Soccer Championship Euro 2004
How the Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games were embedded in urban planning documents
Mega-Event Simulacrum
Mega-event transport legacy in a developing country
Olympic Transport Legacies
Transport legacy of mega-events and the redistribution of accessibility to urban destinations
The Hiding Hand controversy as an analytical approach in the study of urban megaevents
Competition through Interurban Policy Making
The Urban Politics of Mega-Events
Planning Olympic Legacies
The Urban Experience
The Economics of Staging the Olympics
Mega‐sporting events in urban and regional policy
Case Study Research
Olympic Cities
Urban development through hosting international events
Assessing the Impact of Hallmark Events
Globalization, cities and the Summer Olympics
Maximizing Olympic Impacts by Building Up Legacies
A brief historical review of Olympic urbanization
A New Phase in the Competition for the Olympic Gold
Glocalising” urban landscapes
Mega-events and mega-attractions
The Four ‘Knowns’ of Sports Mega‐Events
Olympic Games
Calling the Shots
Post-industrial Trajectories of Mediterranean European Cities
The Sydney 2000 Olympics and Urban Entrepreneurialism
Development and Dreams
The Culture Wars of the Montreal Olympics
| Citations per year | 1.42 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |