Unreformed or Hybrid? Accounting for Pension Arrangements Diversity in the EU
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12067745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristina Matos (0000-0001-7286-4252, University of Minho, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 43-51 |
| Publication date | 2009-04-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Forum for Social Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0736-0932 • E-ISSN: 1874-6381 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12143-009-9050-0 |
| OpenAlex | W1995943692 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 18 |
EU27 pension systems are diverse and different from textbook ideal-type. They are hybrids because they combine public and private pension features. Over a century, public and private pensions have been designed and reformed simultaneously. We examine how the history of those reforms can explain the emergence of existing hybrid pension arrangements
Business · Diversity (politics · Economics · Ideal (ethics · Market economy · Pension · Pension system · Political science · Private pension · Public economics · Social policy · Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Finance
Restructuring Networks in Post-Socialism
Pension Reform in Europe
Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World
Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe
Labor Markets and Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe
Recalibrating Europe’s Welfare Regimes
The New Politics of the Welfare State
The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform
Britain's Pension Crisis — History and Policy
International Non-State Actors and Social Development Policy
Adapting private pensions to public purposes
New Ideas about Old Age Security
When Past Reforms Open New Opportunities
Introduction
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2011 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |