Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Legal or Just? Law, Ethics, and the Double Standard in the Nineteenth-Century Divorce Court

Bibliographic Data

ID12072920
AuthorsJosephine Hoegaerts (0000-0002-3458-5444, KU Leuven, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume26
Issue2
Pages259-284
Publication date2008-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw and History Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0738-2480 • E-ISSN: 1939-9022
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0738248000001310
OpenAlexW1985399129
LanguageEN
References cited18

On January 24, 1885, at 9:30 in the morning, a woman from the small rural village of Saint Laurent in East Flanders entered the Palace of Justice of Ghent. Pregnant with her eighth child, she had fled from her husband and was filing for a divorce. That morning, she was led to a small room—the office of the judge of the Regional Court—and was standing alone with four men whom she barely knew and did not understand because they spoke French. Her husband had only sent a lawyer to represent him. As the woman's “avoué” presented her complaints—abuse, threats, and finally her fear for the life of her unborn child that had forced her to leave the marital home—she could only hope he had correctly recorded her story and was representing it convincingly enough to take her case to the next level. Until then, her divorce had been a game between jurists in which she was not much more than a prop. After this reading of her complaints, however, the whole neighborhood was alerted to her failing marriage. Some neighbors even entered the courtroom with her to act as witnesses. Not only the judge, but the whole local community took up the task to decide if she had been the victim of a derailed husband, or had failed as a wife. And accordingly, it was decided if she was to become a “divorced woman,” with all the social stigmatization attached to that notion, or if she would be forced to return to her abusive husband again

Criminology · Economic Justice · Political science · Sociology · Wife · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Psychology

  • Making Sex

    Thomas Walter Laqueur•Making Sex•1992

  • Putting asunder

    Roderick Phillips•Putting asunder•1988

  • Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language

    Basil Bernstein•Theoretical Studies Towards a…•2005

  • Women, Men and Language

    Jennifer Coates•Women, men, and language•2014

  • Talk Like a Man

    Open Access•Jane Kamensky•Gender & History•1996

  • Language and Masculinity

    Timothy C Frazer, Sally Johnson et al.•Language•1999

  • Great Expectations

    Kirk Jeffrey, Elaine Tyler May•Journal of American History•1981

  • The “Rights” of Husbands and the “Duties” of Wives

    Open Access•Jesse F Battan•Journal of Family History•1999

  • Whores, Whore-Chasers, and Swine

    Open Access•Leonard Abrams, Lynn Abrams•Journal of Family History•1996

  • Reading Microhistory

    Thomas Kuehn•The Journal of Modern History•1989

  • Gender and the Language of Insult in Early Modern London

    Laura Gowing•History Workshop Journal•1993

  • The Double Standard

    Keith Thomas•Journal of the History of Ideas•1959

  • Language and masculinity

    Open Access•Bettina Baron•Journal of Pragmatics•1998

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae