Experimenting with collaboration in the Smart City
Legal and governance structures of Urban Living Labs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12079873 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Astrid Voorwinden (0000-0002-2802-0383, University of Groningen, corresponding author), Ellen Van Bueren (0000-0002-4375-1192, Delft University of Technology), L A Verhoef (0000-0001-5255-0707, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions), Leendert Verhoef |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 101875-101875 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Government Information Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0740-624X • E-ISSN: 1872-9517 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101875 |
| OpenAlex | W4388576670 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 41 |
Urban Living Labs (ULLs) have been implemented in many cities, but their organizational and legal structure has not often been analyzed. ULLs aim to provide a space for different parties to research, develop, and test solutions to urban problems whilst engaging with local communities. Their experimental approach to urban innovation and to public-private collaboration makes flexibility, openness, and informality important. However, ULLs are also confronted with existing legal frameworks, responsibilities, and liabilities. Whilst they aim at shared decision-making and horizontality, they must navigate public and private interests, and interact with local government as well. To understand these dynamics, this article examines the legal and organizational structures of ULLs, the factors and trade-offs that influence it, and the role municipal government plays in in these structures. This article analyzes the different forms and trajectories of ULLs in practice, through semi-structured interviews held in four labs in Amsterdam. Through qualitative research, we found that 1) ULLs are partnerships that exist on a spectrum of formalization, from informal to highly formal; 2) the degree of formalization is influenced by financial, legal, and organizational factors that change over time; 3) each degree of formalization is associated to trade-offs, even if these trade-offs are not explicitly formulated by the people involved; 4) tensions arise from the municipality's double role as public authority and as partner. We conclude that ULLs could gain from clearly identifying the legal frameworks that condition their structure, actions, and future
Corporate governance · Economics · Flexibility (engineering · Government (linguistics · Management · Openness to experience · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Innovation, Technology, and Society · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Administration · Smart Cities and Technologies
The dual fabric of smart cities - Theorizing the integration of informal and formal urban elements
Bridging digital divides
Urban living labs as catalysts for innovation
Analyzing digital government partnerships
Building smarter cities together
A Qualitative Methodology for Identifying Governance Challenges and Advancements in Positive Energy District Labs
Pop-up and microscale urban living labs are seeds of sustainable urban transformation? An analysis of knowledge transfer and the mechanism of transformative learning
Experimental governance
Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements
Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe
Case Study Research
Conceptualizing Testbed Planning
Challenges of Urban Living Labs towards the Future of Local Innovation
The promise of living labs to the Quadruple Helix stakeholders
Legitimacy in municipal experimental governance
Temporal challenges of building a circular city district through living-lab experiments
Transitioning Urban Experiments
Co-production for innovation
Living labs
Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR)
Mandatory provisioning of digital public services as a feasible service delivery strategy
Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation
Interrogating urban experiments
Experimental governance for low-carbon buildings and cities
Expertise, Representation and the Common Good
Exploitation as innovation
The Practice of Contracting in Public Private Partnerships
Public Private Partnerships
The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments
Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void
Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change
Mix and Match
Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city
Urban Laboratories
| Citations per year | 3.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |