Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Experimenting with collaboration in the Smart City

Legal and governance structures of Urban Living Labs

Bibliographic Data

ID12079873
AuthorsAstrid Voorwinden (0000-0002-2802-0383, University of Groningen, corresponding author), Ellen Van Bueren (0000-0002-4375-1192, Delft University of Technology), L A Verhoef (0000-0001-5255-0707, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions), Leendert Verhoef
Year2023
Volume40
Issue4
Pages101875-101875
Publication date2023-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernment Information Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0740-624X • E-ISSN: 1872-9517
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.giq.2023.101875
OpenAlexW4388576670
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited41

Urban Living Labs (ULLs) have been implemented in many cities, but their organizational and legal structure has not often been analyzed. ULLs aim to provide a space for different parties to research, develop, and test solutions to urban problems whilst engaging with local communities. Their experimental approach to urban innovation and to public-private collaboration makes flexibility, openness, and informality important. However, ULLs are also confronted with existing legal frameworks, responsibilities, and liabilities. Whilst they aim at shared decision-making and horizontality, they must navigate public and private interests, and interact with local government as well. To understand these dynamics, this article examines the legal and organizational structures of ULLs, the factors and trade-offs that influence it, and the role municipal government plays in in these structures. This article analyzes the different forms and trajectories of ULLs in practice, through semi-structured interviews held in four labs in Amsterdam. Through qualitative research, we found that 1) ULLs are partnerships that exist on a spectrum of formalization, from informal to highly formal; 2) the degree of formalization is influenced by financial, legal, and organizational factors that change over time; 3) each degree of formalization is associated to trade-offs, even if these trade-offs are not explicitly formulated by the people involved; 4) tensions arise from the municipality's double role as public authority and as partner. We conclude that ULLs could gain from clearly identifying the legal frameworks that condition their structure, actions, and future

Corporate governance · Economics · Flexibility (engineering · Government (linguistics · Management · Openness to experience · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Innovation, Technology, and Society · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Administration · Smart Cities and Technologies

  • The dual fabric of smart cities - Theorizing the integration of informal and formal urban elements

    Open Access•Dulce María Villegas Núñez, Larissa Galdino De Magalhães Santos et al.•Cities•2026

  • Bridging digital divides

    Open Access•Dulce María Villegas Núñez, Björn Niehaves•Cities•2026

  • Urban living labs as catalysts for innovation

    Open Access•Fernando Almeida, Nathaniel Deutsch•Urban Governance•2025

  • Analyzing digital government partnerships

    Open Access•Yiwei Gong, Yan Yang•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Building smarter cities together

    Open Access•Jian Kong, Jungwon Kong et al.•Cities•2024

  • A Qualitative Methodology for Identifying Governance Challenges and Advancements in Positive Energy District Labs

    Open Access•Silvia Soutullo, Oscar Seco et al.•Urban Science•2025

  • Pop-up and microscale urban living labs are seeds of sustainable urban transformation? An analysis of knowledge transfer and the mechanism of transformative learning

    Open Access•Renata Jóźwik•Cities•2026

  • Experimental governance

    Open Access•Annica Kronsell, Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren•European Planning Studies•2018

  • Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements

    Open Access•Rob Raven, Frans Sengers et al.•European Planning Studies•2019

  • Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe

    Open Access•Yuliya Voytenko Palgan, K Mccormick et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2016

  • Case Study Research

    Harris Chaiklin•The Journal of Nervous and Mental…•1991

  • Conceptualizing Testbed Planning

    Open Access•Lina Berglund-Snodgrass, Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren•Urban Planning•2020

  • Challenges of Urban Living Labs towards the Future of Local Innovation

    Open Access•Aksel Ersoy, Ellen Van Bueren•Urban Planning•2020

  • The promise of living labs to the Quadruple Helix stakeholders

    Open Access•Huong Thu Nguyen, Pilar Marquès•European Planning Studies•2022

  • Legitimacy in municipal experimental governance

    Open Access•Erica Eneqvist, Jessica Algehed et al.•European Planning Studies•2022

  • Temporal challenges of building a circular city district through living-lab experiments

    Maarit Särkilahti, Maria Åkerman et al.•European Planning Studies•2022

  • Transitioning Urban Experiments

    Open Access•Christian Scholl, Joop de Kraker et al.•GAIA - Ecological Perspectives…•2018

  • Co-production for innovation

    Open Access•Giorgia Nesti•Policy and Society•2017

  • Living labs

    Open Access•Mila Gascó-Hernández, Mila Gascó•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR)

    Open Access•Vishanth Weerakkody, Marijn Janssen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • Mandatory provisioning of digital public services as a feasible service delivery strategy

    Open Access•Luca Tangi, Michele Benedetti et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation

    Open Access•Ada Scupola, Ines Mergel•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Interrogating urban experiments

    Open Access•Federico Caprotti, Roger Cowley•Urban Geography•2016

  • Experimental governance for low-carbon buildings and cities

    Open Access•Jeroen Van Der Heijden•Cities•2016

  • Expertise, Representation and the Common Good

    Open Access•Liisa Häikiö•Urban Studies•2007

  • Exploitation as innovation

    Open Access•Linnet Taylor•Regional Studies•2020

  • The Practice of Contracting in Public Private Partnerships

    Open Access•Eoin Reeves•Public Administration•2008

  • Public Private Partnerships

    Open Access•Bram Steijn, Erik‐hans Klijn et al.•Public Administration•2011

  • The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments

    Open Access•Steven Bernstein, Matthew Hoffmann•Policy Sciences•2018

  • Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void

    Open Access•Maarten A Hajer, Maarten Hajer•Policy Sciences•2003

  • Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change

    Open Access•Harriet Bulkeley, Vanesa Castán Broto•Transactions of the Institute of…•2012

  • Mix and Match

    Open Access•Rianne Warsen, Erik Hans Klijn et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2019

  • Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city

    Open Access•James Evans, J P Evans•Transactions of the Institute of…•2011

  • Urban Laboratories

    Open Access•Andy Karvonen, Andrew Karvonen et al.•International Journal of Urban…•2014

Citations per year3.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae