Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Understanding UK farmers’ Brexit voting decision

A behavioural approach

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12092767
AutoresDaniel May (0000-0002-4749-3637), Daniel E May (0000-0002-4269-5459, Harper Adams University, autor correspondente), Sara Arancibia (Diego Portales University), Louise Manning (0000-0002-9900-7303, Royal Agricultural University)
Ano2020
Volume81
Páginas281-293
Data de publicação2020-11-05
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Rural Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0743-0167 • E-ISSN: 1873-1392
EditoraElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.042
OpenAlexW3094974350
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas36

In spite of the potential negative effects that Brexit could bring to the United Kingdom (UK), the majority of the electorate voted to leave the European Union (EU). As a result of this paradoxical choice, a number of studies have been developed to understand the factors that triggered this voting decision. Most of them take into account factors related to immigration from East Europe, national identity, and sovereignty recovering, among others. However, these factors do not seem to reflect the reasons behind farmers' Brexit voting choice. Using a behavioural approach based on the theory of planned behaviour, the aim of the study was to contribute to the body of literature by undertaking an indicative study of UK farmers' Brexit voting decisions. The study found that for the sample group, voting choice was strongly influenced by farmers’ perceptions about EU legislation, their attitudes towards the EU, their perceived capacity to control factors that impact on the farm performance, their sense of self and their notions of autonomy within the confines of prescriptive agricultural policy and the influence of their social relationships

Autonomy · Brexit · Economics · European union · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Sample (material · Voting · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agricultural risk and resilience · Law

  • The Brexit trajectory

    Open Access•Roch Dunin-Wąsowicz, Max Josef Migden et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2026

  • The out-migration of young people from a region of the “Empty Spain”

    Open Access•Miguel Ángel García Arias, Alfredo Tolón Becerra et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Farmers’ perceived effect of the Covid-19 pandemic and its relationship to preparedness and risk perception

    Open Access•Emmanouil Tyllianakis, Kolade V Otokiti et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2024

  • Examining the connection between resourcefulness and resilience

    Open Access•Fahimeh Malekinezhad, Evgenia Micha et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2024

  • Quitter la PAC, comment et pour quoi faire

    Viviane Gravey, Ludivine Petetin et al.•Politique européenne•2021

  • Transforming the food system

    Open Access•Julia Martin-Ortega, Lukas J Wolf et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • The Role of Personality Traits, Cooperative Behaviour and Trust in Governments on the Brexit Referendum Outcome

    Open Access•Francisco J Areal•Social Sciences•2021

  • Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined

    Open Access•Eleonora Alabrese, Sascha O Becker et al.•European Journal of Political…•2019

  • PLS path modeling

    Open Access•Michel Tenenhaus, Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi et al.•Computational Statistics & Data…•2005

  • Mirror, mirror on the wall

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, G Tomas M Hult et al.•Journal of the Academy of…•2017

  • The Relationship between the Brexit Vote and Individual Predictors of Prejudice

    Open Access•Agnieszka Golec De Zavala, Rita Guerra et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2017

  • From Intentions to Actions

    Icek Ajzen•Action Control•1985

  • Using PLS path modeling in new technology research

    Open Access•Jörg Henseler, Geoffrey Hubona et al.•Industrial Management & Data…•2016

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis

    Open Access•Sascha O Becker, Thiemo Fetzer et al.•Economic Policy•2017

  • Facts or Feelings, Facts and Feelings? The Post‐Democracy Narrative in the Brexit Debate

    Open Access•Karin Forss, Linnea Magro•European Policy Analysis•2016

  • Immobility and the Brexit vote

    Neil Lee, Katy Morris et al.•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2017

  • Brexit and the relevance of regional personality traits

    Harry Garretsen, Janka I Stoker et al.•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2018

  • How Brexit was made in England

    Open Access•A Henderson, Charlie Jeffery et al.•The British Journal of Politics…•2017

  • Consequences of Brexit and options for a 'Global Britain’

    Open Access•Steven Brakman, Harry Garretsen et al.•Papers of the Regional Science…•2017

  • UK trade and FDI

    Open Access•Swati Dhingra, Gianmarco I P Ottaviano et al.•Papers of the Regional Science…•2017

  • Brexit as a scandal

    Aida A Hozic, Jacqui True•Review of International Political…•2017

  • Farmer autonomy and the farming self

    Open Access•Paul V Stock, Jérémie Forney•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • Applying partial least squares to model genetically modified food purchase intentions in southern Spain consumers

    Open Access•Macario Rodríguez-Entrena, Melania Salazar‐Ordóñez et al.•Food Policy•2013

  • Preventing young farmers from leaving the farm

    Open Access•Daniel May, Daniel E May et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Identifying beliefs underlying successors’ intention to take over the farm

    Open Access•Marcele Morais, Manoela Morais et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • The mismatch between local voting and the local economic consequences of Brexit

    Bart Los, Phillip Mccann et al.•Regional Studies•2017

  • Brexit

    Jacqueline O’reilly, Julie Froud et al.•Socio-Economic Review•2016

  • Political Psychology of European Integration

    Open Access•Ian Manners•Political Psychology•2018

  • Why Britain Voted for Brexit

    Harold D Clarke, Matthew Goodwin et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2017

  • The Brexit vote

    Sara B Hobolt•Journal of European Public Policy•2016

  • Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven Sampling

    Open Access•M J Salganik, Douglas D Heckathorn•Sociological Methodology•2004

  • Neoliberal natures on the farm

    Open Access•Paul V Stock, Jérémie Forney et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • Brexit

    Open Access•Thomas Sampson•The Journal of Economic…•2017

  • Psychological and Behavioral Predictors of Rural In-migration

    Open Access•Yoshinori Nakagawa•Rural Sociology•2018

Obras citantes distintas7
Citações por ano1,4
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2026 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae