Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Experiences of prognosis disclosure versus nondisclosure among family caregivers of persons with advanced cancer

Bibliographic Data

ID12095035
AuthorsSravannthi Maya (Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad), Mahati Chittem (0000-0002-8978-3544, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad), Shweta Chawak (0000-0001-8732-1357, Jindal School of Psychology and Counselling, O.P. Jindal Global University, Haryana, India), Patricia A Parker (0000-0003-1878-1186, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Smita C Banerjee (0000-0001-5479-5978, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume48
Issue9
Pages905-915
Publication date2023-12-20
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDeath Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0748-1187 • E-ISSN: 1091-7683
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07481187.2023.2293711
PMID38117258
OpenAlexW4389993081
LanguageEN
References cited22

Caregiving in the South Asian context is often assumed by family automatically for the person with cancer (PWC). In this paper, we applied the disclosure decision-making model (DD-MM) to understand the motives behind cancer prognosis disclosure (or not) by caregivers to the PWC. Fifty caregivers participated in semi-structured interviews; and data were analyzed using Framework Approach. For the disclosing caregivers, some of the themes that emerged were consistent with the DD-MM framework while others were not. In particular, the theme "recipient assessment" was part of the DD-MM framework, while others such as unmet communication needs, caregiver self-reflection, and family support were outside of the framework. In contrast, for the non-disclosing caregivers, the reasons for nondisclosure fit very concisely into the DD-MM framework, particularly with information assessment, recipient assessment, and (non) disclosure efficacy. This study has significant implications for development of communication skills trainings around holding family meetings in India

Context (archaeology · Family caregivers · Family medicine · Clinical Psychology · Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units · Medicine · Nursing · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology

  • Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

    Open Access•Nicola Gale, Nicola K Gale et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2013

  • Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

    Jane Ritchie, Liz Spencer•Analyzing Qualitative Data•2010

  • Indian Systems Of Medicine

    Open Access•B Ravishankar, VJ Shukla•African Journal of Traditional…•2008

  • Predictors of Familism in the Caregiver Role

    Open Access•Sahdia Parveen, Val Morrison•Journal of Health Psychology•2009

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae