Department of law and ethics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12097340 |
|---|---|
| Authors | ARTHUR ZUCKER (corresponding author), Louise Annario |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 5-6 |
| Pages | 493-497 |
| Publication date | 1985-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Death Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0748-1187 • E-ISSN: 1091-7683 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07481188508252540 |
| PMID | 10275449 |
| OpenAlex | W2472936400 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Angela Holder ends her Journal of Pediatrics article, “Parents, Courts, and Refusal of Treatment” with the summary sentence, “In cases involving high risks or choices of therapy ... courts do seem to al- low parents latitude to make their own decisions” (1). On the other hand, Henry Hyde has said “... a question of life or death for a born person ought to belong to nobody. ... The Constitution ought The relevant history of the Baby Doe debate is brief enough. At to protect that child. ...” (2)
Computer security · Constitution · Criminology · nobody · Political science · Sentence · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Infant Health and Development · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|