Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attitudes of clinical psychologists and medical doctors to assisted dying in the UK

A mixed-methods survey

Bibliographic Data

ID12097653
AuthorsEmma Acford (0000-0002-7992-4016, University of Leicester, corresponding author), Alice Welham (0000-0002-5753-7269, University of Birmingham), Sarah Gunn (0000-0002-8492-060X, University of Leicester, corresponding author)
Year2025
Pages1-13
Publication date2025-09-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDeath Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0748-1187 • E-ISSN: 1091-7683
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07481187.2025.2556118
PMID40944604
OpenAlexW4414162421
LanguageEN
References cited25

If assisted dying (AD) were legalized in the UK, clinical psychologists (CPs) and medical doctors would very likely be involved in its processes. However, evidence around these professional groups' attitudes to AD is limited. To understand attitudes of UK-based CPs and medical doctors to AD, 347 CPs ( n = 292) and medical doctors ( n = 55) completed a survey on AD attitudes, psychological wellbeing, psychological flexibility and demographics, with additional open questions. CPs held significantly more favorable attitudes toward AD than doctors. A regression model for CP data including age, years qualified, psychological wellbeing, psychological flexibility, sex, religiosity and ethnicity significantly predicted AD attitudes. Thematic analysis of open questions developed five themes: conceptualizing AD; navigating eligibility and access; risk and regulation; societal reform and infrastructure; and professional roles and dilemmas. These findings emphasize key variables in supporting CPs and doctors to potentially work around AD, highlighting needs for informed discussions and robust support systems

Ethnic group · Flexibility (engineering · Medical decision making · Religiosity · Survey data collection · Thematic analysis · Ethics in medical practice · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient Dignity and Privacy

  • The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)

    Open Access•Ruth Tennant, Louise Hiller et al.•Health and Quality of Life Outcomes•2007

  • Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II

    Open Access•Frank W Bond, Steven C Hayes et al.•Behavior Therapy•2011

  • Work Stress in NHS Employees

    Open Access•Jermaine Ravalier, Andrew McVicar et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • US physicians' attitudes concerning euthanasia and physician-assisted death

    George E Dickinson, D A Clark et al.•Mortality•2005

  • Views of Psychologists About Their Role in Hastened Death

    Open Access•Silvia Marina, Tony Wainwright et al.•OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying•2021

  • Assessing Right to Die Attitudes

    Open Access•James R Rogers•Journal of Social Issues•1996

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • How, When, and Why Do Religious Actors Use Public Reason? The Case of Assisted Dying in Britain

    Open Access•Steven Kettell•Politics and Religion•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae