Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Philosophes du langage et autonymie

Une déjà longue histoire

Bibliographic Data

ID12100472
AuthorsPhilippe De Brabanter (0000-0002-7259-1159, Institut Jean Nicod, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume27
Issue1
Pages11-43
Publication date2005-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistoire Épistémologie Langage (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0750-8069 • E-ISSN: 1638-1580
PublisherEDP Sciences (PUBLISHER • FR)
DOI10.3406/hel.2005.2048
OpenAlexW2008845123
LanguageFR
References cited13

This paper reviews the wealth of theories put forward by philosophers of language over the last 120 years to account for autonymy (= the mention of linguistic expressions), and relates these theories to the major developments undergone by the discipline. The philosophers-cum-logicians from the turn of the XIXth to the XXth century (notably, Frege, Tarski and Carnap) hoped to build formal languages for science that would not exhibit the flaws of natural languages. But their logicist project proved unfeasible and interest shifted from formal systems to language and ordinary speech. The largely prescriptive judgements of philosophers of language concurrently gave way to description and analysis of linguistic phenomena, with special focus on meaning. Theories of autonymy bear witness to these transformations: from proposals tailored to the characteristics of formal languages (autonyms as names or definite descriptions), they have evolved into accounts that allow for the diversity of autonymy-related phenomena. These theories provide explanations •some better than others •for the numerous instances of •simultaneous use and mention” of an expression (cf. Your •sweetheart” has arrived). Such hybrid utterances are important because they affect our ways of looking at some central issues in the philosophy of language, notably that of the semantics/ pragmatics interface

Epistemology · Focus (optics · Formal semantics (linguistics · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Pragmatics · Semantics (computer science · Witness · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy

  • Meaning and necessity

    Rudolf Carnap•Meaning and necessity•1947

  • From a Logical Point of View

    W V Quine, Willard Van Orman Quine•From a logical point of view•1980

  • Logische Syntax der Sprache

    Open Access•Rudolf Carnap, Moritz Schlick et al.•Logische Syntax der Sprache•1934

  • Les logiciens et le métalangage naturel

    Open Access•Josette Rey-Debove•Histoire Épistémologie Langage•1979

  • Mental Acts

    Alan Donagan, P T Geach et al.•The Philosophical Review•1958

  • The Alleged Distinction between Use and Mention

    Niels Egmont Christensen•The Philosophical Review•1967

  • The Stoics on Ambiguity

    David Blank, Catherine Atherton•The Philosophical Review•1995

  • Varieties of Use and Mention

    Newton Garver•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1965

  • The Semantic Conception of Truth

    Alfred Tarski•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1944

  • Quotational Mixing of Use and Mention

    Ori Simchen•The Philosophical Quarterly•1999

  • An analysis of linguistic signs occurring in suppositio materialis or the meaning of quotation marks and their phonetic equivalents

    Open Access•Holger Steen Sorensen•Lingua•1961

  • Quotations as Demonstrations

    Herbert H Clark, Richard J Gerrig•Language•1990

  • Speech Acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Speech acts•1969

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae