Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

La normativité dans la Théorie Pure du Droit peut-elle se prévaloir d'arguments transcendantaux

Bibliographic Data

ID12110010
AuthorsStanley L Paulson (corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume7
Issue1
Pages349-370
Publication date1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDroit et société (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0769-3362 • E-ISSN: 1969-6973
PublisherLGDJ (PUBLISHER • FR)
DOI10.3406/dreso.1987.970
OpenAlexW2334281490
LanguageFR

In the "Pure Theory of Law", Kelsen's normativity thesis may appear to be based on transcendent al arguments. Some critics have concluded that it is. The author demonstrates, by drawing a parallel between Kant's concerna and Kelsen's, that a transcendental argument cannot have the same function in both endeavors and that its role in legal theory can only be a more modest one

Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Function (biology · Humanities · Transcendental number · Chemistry · Law and Political Science · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae