Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Word frequency and morphological family size effects on the accuracy and speed of lexical access in school‐aged bilingual students

Bibliographic Data

ID12114122
AuthorsNeda Akbari (University of Canberra, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume26
Issue3
Pages311-328
Publication date2015-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0802-6106 • E-ISSN: 1473-4192
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ijal.12113
OpenAlexW1846683939
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited48

This study investigated whether school‐aged bilingual students demonstrate word frequency and morphological family size ( MFS ) effects for written L 2 words, and if so, the extent to which the effects are present for bilingual students in different grades. The study revealed both word frequency and MFS effects for the bilingual students in relation to the accuracy of their responses. The bilingual students were less accurate in response to mid and low‐frequency words and words with a very small morphological family compared to the monolingual students. Despite that, they demonstrated similar speed of access to the written L 2 words in different frequency ranges and with different MFS s. The findings were discussed in terms of the strength of connections between the form and meaning of words

Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Neuroscience of multilingualism · Word (group theory · Word lists by frequency · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • Learning novel complex words in a second language

    Open Access•Junmin Li, Ali Behzadnia et al.•Studies in Second Language…•2026

  • Learning Vocabulary in Another Language

    Open Access•Paul Nation, I S P Nation•Learning Vocabulary in Another…•2001

  • How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional.

    Albert Costa, Mikel Santesteban et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2006

  • Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production?

    Open Access•Iva Ivanova, Albert Costa•Acta Psychologica•2008

  • The Language Contact Profile

    Barbara F Freed, Dan P Dewey et al.•Studies in Second Language…•2004

  • Lexical access in bilinguals

    Open Access•Ellen Bialystok, Fergus I M Craik et al.•Journal of Neurolinguistics•2008

  • Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification

    Open Access•Tanar H Gollan, Rosa I Montoya et al.•Memory & Cognition•2005

  • A capacity theory of comprehension

    Marcel Adam Just, Patricia A Carpenter•Psychological Review•1992

  • How Large a Vocabulary is Needed For Reading and Listening?

    Paul Nation, I Nation•Canadian Modern Language Review/…•2006

  • German particle verbs and word formation

    Anke Lüdeling, Nivja H De Jong et al.•Verb-Particle Explorations•2002

  • Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2 and L1 reading comprehension

    Open Access•Amos Van Gelderen, Rob Schoonen et al.•International Journal of…•2003

  • Large constituent families help children parse compounds

    Open Access•Andrea Krott, Elena Nicoladis•Journal of Child Language•2005

  • Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test

    Open Access•Norbert Schmitt, Diane Schmitt et al.•Language Testing•2001

  • The Yes/No test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge

    Open Access•kira Mochida, Michael Harrington•Language Testing•2006

  • The on-line Yes/No test as a placement tool

    Open Access•Michael Harrington, Michael Carey•System•2009

  • A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching

    Open Access•Norbert Schmitt, Diane Schmitt•Language Teaching•2014

  • The Interplay Between Automatic and Control Processes in Reading

    Open Access•Jeffrey J Walczyk•Reading Research Quarterly•2000

  • Discrepancy Definitions of Reading Disability

    Keith E Stanovich•Reading Research Quarterly•1991

  • Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children

    Open Access•Ellen Bialystok, Gigi Luk et al.•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2009

  • Word Family Size and French-Speaking Children's Segmentation of Existing Compounds

    Open Access•Elena Nicoladis, Andrea Krott•Language Learning•2007

  • Metacognitive and Language-Specific Knowledge in Native and Foreign Language Reading Comprehension

    Open Access•Rob Schoonen, Jan H Hulstijn et al.•Language Learning•1998

  • Reading in Spanish and English

    Open Access•Mark A Clarke•Language Learning•1979

  • Morphological Family Size Effects in Young First and Second Language Learners

    Open Access•Marlies De Zeeuw, Ludo Verhoeven et al.•Language Learning•2012

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae