Reader engagement across cultures, languages and contexts of publication in business research articles
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12114170 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Enrique Lafuente‐Millán (Universidad de Zaragoza, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 201-223 |
| Publication date | 2013-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0802-6106 • E-ISSN: 1473-4192 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ijal.12019 |
| OpenAlex | W1500929996 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 39 |
Engagement markers are crucial interpersonal tools to interact with readers and draw support for the writer's positions. However, little is known about the effect of the writer's cultural background and language, as well as the context of publication, on the way authors use these strategies. The present study provides a quantitative and contrastive analysis based on a corpus consisting of business management articles written in different cultures and languages ( A nglophone/ E nglish vs. S panish) and aimed at different contexts of publication (local vs. international). The results obtained indicate that, although context of publication and national culture are powerful factors regulating the use of these strategies, other aspects such as L 1 transfer and L 2 proficiency may have some bearing on the use of these resources
Context (archaeology · Interpersonal communication · Linguistics · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
“We must conclude that…”
Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing
Engagement strategies in English and Arabic newspaper editorials
A cross-cultural, cross-contextual study of interactional metadiscourse in academic research articles
“Think about how fascinating this is”
Engaging with the reader in research articles in English
Does ChatGPT Write Like a Student? Engagement Markers in Argumentative Essays
Comparing Engagement Markers in Economics Research Articles and Opinion Pieces
Engaging the public in science crowdfunding
Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing
Engaging in predatory practices
Marcadores de implicación en los discursos de campaña para las elecciones generales de 2016 en España
Interaction in Argumentative Essays
Writers’ stance in academic writing of an open distance and e-learning (ODeL) institution
Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters
Engagement and strategic alignment in academic talks across languages and disciplines
Metadiscourse in academic writing
Disseminating and constructing academic knowledge in online scholarly journals
Question illocutionary force indicating devices in academic writing
A meta-discursive analysis of engagement markers in QAnon anti-immigration comments
Reflexive metadiscourse in research articles in Spanish
Interactional metadiscourse
Academic Voices
Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge
Bringing in the Reader
The ‘I’ in identity
Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles
Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing
The Use of Personal Pronouns
Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse
Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
Directives
Consider This
Metadiscourse in Academic Writing
Interaction in academic writing
‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’
The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles
The construction of the author's voice in academic writing
Attitude markers in business management research articles
Epistemic modality markers in research articles
Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L
Genre Analysis
Stance and engagement
Politeness
An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish
Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.83 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |