The Urban and the Rural in the Development Debate
An Overview
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12116202 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jan Hesselberg (University of Oslo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 493-507 |
| Publication date | 2005-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Forum for Development Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0803-9410 • E-ISSN: 1891-1765 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08039410.2005.9666325 |
| OpenAlex | W2032420551 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
There is much confusion in the use of the terms ‘urban’ and ‘rural’. The article defines these terms and shows that the South already has a high degree of urbanisation. From 1945 onwards, ideas about the primacy of rural or urban investments for economic growth and development have shifted. An overview of these ideas is presented, together with the evolving strategic vision of UN-Habitat
Civil engineering · Confusion · Development economics · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Political science · Rural development · Urban planning · Urbanization · Engineering · Indian Economic and Social Development · Psychology · Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Problems of regional economic planning.
Why poor people stay poor
Les villes et la richesse des nations
Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour
The links between urban and rural development
Economic theory and underdeveloped regions
Tanzania 1920-63
The Geography of Modernization in Kenya
The Urban Order
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |