From Good Governance to Development? A Critical Perspective on the Case of Norway’s Oil for Development
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12116295 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Audun Solli (University of Oslo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 65-85 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Forum for Development Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0803-9410 • E-ISSN: 1891-1765 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08039410.2010.521573 |
| OpenAlex | W2126560978 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 25 |
Good governance is a key buzzword in development aid discourse. It is a catch‐all term denoting capacity building, poverty reduction and democracy, where the latter two elements function as legitimising factors. This paper discusses the Norwegian aid programme Oil for Development’s understanding of good governance. Good governance discourse rests on a vision of African states as ‘failed’, and explains the lack of development as a product of poor governance. In Oil for Development, good governance simultaneously works as a condition to qualify for aid, a tool to implement aid and a goal for aid. Oil for Development sees good governance as mainly technical capacity‐building, aiming to maximise government revenues from oil and clarifying roles in the state apparatus to contribute to a balance of power between the state and the oil industry. Poverty reduction and democracy building enter as legitimising elements providing the programme’s rationale. This approach to development rests on a hope of a ‘trickle‐down’ effect from increased capacity in the state apparatus to poverty reduction. This expectation is unlikely to materialise, as the formal structures of Oil for Development seeks to strengthen are trumped by informal ones. Further, the programme pretends to build its approach on an international consensus among researchers on governance, which effectively depoliticises aid and sees governance as an issue for experts. What constitutes ‘good’ in governance is however not a straightforward issue of clarity in roles and increased capacity
Business · CLARITY · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Good governance · Government (linguistics · Management · Political science · Poverty · Project governance · Revenue · State (computer science · International Development and Aid · Mining and Resource Management · Natural Resources and Economic Development · Public Administration · Accounting
Landing capital and assembling ‘investable land’ in the extractive and agricultural sectors
How global norms matter
Back to the Future? Charting Features of the Not-So-New Convergence in Aidland
The Shaping and Changing of Petroleum Resource Governance
The Current Role of Western Development Actors as Knowledge and Policy Providers
Transfer of ‘Western’ Institutions to a Transition Economy Context
Warlord Politics and African States
Cursed by Resources or Institutions?
Resource Curse or Not
Quasi-States
Africa and the International System
States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control
Good Governance and democracy in a world of neoliberal regimes
State in Society
The Paradox of Plenty
The World Bank, Governance and Theories of Political Action in Africa
Escaping the Resource Curse
European Donors and ‘Good Governance’
Governance, good governance and global governance
Institutions and the Resource Curse
Capacity development for good governance in developing societies
Good governance
Citizen and Subject
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2024 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |