Breaking Bonds

Rupturing Familial and Social Networks through Supervisory Bail Conditions

Bibliographic Data

ID12122001
AuthorsNicole M Myers (0009-0004-1152-4173, Queen's University, corresponding author), Joseph T McDermott (Queen's University), Joseph McDermott (0009-0004-6038-3768, Queen's University)
Year2026
Volume41
Issue1
Pages1-23
Publication date2026-01-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0829-3201 • E-ISSN: 1911-0227
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/cls.2025.10034
OpenAlexW7125401359
LanguageEN
References cited29

Surety supervision is one of the most onerous bail conditions imposed on legally innocent people pretrial. Sureties are generally family or friends who promise a sum of money and agree to supervise the accused, enforcing conditions and reporting non-compliance. Drawing on data from 32 in-depth interviews with individuals who have acted as sureties, this paper examines the complex, contradictory, and damaging implications of exploiting personal relationships for the state’s surveillance and monitoring interests. We argue that by placing sureties in such a role, the court stresses the accused’s social relationships by transforming the accused’s support network into an apparatus of state control. Sureties describe exploited relational bonds and ruptured relationships, insisting they will never act as a surety again. We conclude by outlining directions for reform, including changing the nature of surety supervision, decriminalization and developing bail supervision programs

Accident (philosophy · Bond · Liability · Social relationship · State (computer science · Surety · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Deception detection and forensic psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access