The two regimes of postwar shipping
Denmark and Norway as case studies, 1960–2010
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12123715 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Jes Iversen (0000-0003-4085-5524, Copenhagen Business School, corresponding author), Stig Tenold (Norwegian School of Economics) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 720-733 |
| Publication date | 2014-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Maritime History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0843-8714 • E-ISSN: 2052-7756 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0843871414552611 |
| OpenAlex | W2070429793 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
The aim of this article is to illustrate the most important changes in the regulatory framework of the shipping sector from the 1960s to 2010, and to analyse the basis for, and effects of, these changes. In order to explain how the transformation has occurred, we use two traditional maritime nations—Denmark and Norway—as case studies. First, we introduce the two regimes of Danish and Norwegian shipping: ‘the national regime’ from the early 1960s to the mid-1970s; and ‘the competitive regime’, which was fully established by the middle of the 1990s and still persists. Then, we briefly sketch the bargaining that accompanied the shift from the national regime to the competitive regime. Specifically, we show that the new regime primarily accommodated the interests of private actors such as shipping companies, rather than the interests of the authorities and the trade unions
Danish · Economic system · Economics · Economy · International economics · International trade · Norwegian · Order (exchange · Political science · Sketch · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Finance
| Citations per year | 0.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |