Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scholasticism for Instagram

On the Digital Anthropology of Modernity

Bibliographic Data

ID12126342
AuthorsDenis Assistant (St Petersburg University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume29
Issue6
Pages1-19
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophical Literary Journal Logos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0869-5377 • E-ISSN: 2499-9628
PublisherNational Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.22394/0869-5377-2019-6-1-17
OpenAlexW4234813239
LanguageEN
References cited3

Applying the general view of theories of systems and social action, the article shows how the images and patterns of the digital world revolve around the idea of an individualized subject. Embodying the idea of a unique “self ” - the basis of our cultural model of personality - paradoxically requires replicating, selecting and reproducing the atomistic images of the virtual world. This is a cultural model as well as a psychological one: it is manifested in institutionalized practices, has symbolic structure, imagery, ideology and is entrenched in praxis. However, the logic of operating with the alienated and integrated, replicated and authentic, external and internal - when the source of internal vital forces is assigned from the outside - directs us to anthropology, which reveals a similar pattern in a wide range of ethnographic material. The author therefore favors anthropological models over a more conventional structuralist analysis. The article shows how the basic cultural model of the Western concept of the self is manifested in the modern practice of replicating the virtual. Therefore a contradictio in contrarium is exposed through an illustrative sociological description of the way an impersonal system of social action produces its own environment and structures behavior inside and outside of the online communication as a positive feedback mechanism. However, if an authentic subject is composed entirely of replicated elements, then what position does the subject occupy in it? No answer to the question is available from inside the schema. The author’s solution is that the implementation of the schema itself through a system of actions embodies the basic concepts for locating the source of individual uniqueness outside of the subject itself. Hence, copying and replicating is the logical embodiment of our model of the self, and not at all a dissolution into the virtual and replacement of the authentic version by a digital one

Cultural anthropology · Late modernity · Praxis · Schema (genetic algorithms · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia

  • Art And Agency

    Alfred Gell•Art and agency•1998

  • Behavior, Purpose and Teleology

    Open Access•Arturo Rosenblueth, Norbert Wiener et al.•Philosophy of Science•1943

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae