Does Women's Liberation Imply Children's Liberation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12147302 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laura Purdy (0000-0003-4158-5802, corresponding author), Laura M Purdy |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 49-62 |
| Publication date | 1988-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hypatia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-5367 • E-ISSN: 1527-2001 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00068.x |
| OpenAlex | W2045069219 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
Shulamith Firestone argues that for women to embrace equal rights without recognizing them for children is unjust. Protection of children is merely repressive control: they are infantilized by our treatment of them. I maintain that many children no longer get much protection, but neither are they being provided with an environment conducive to learning prudence or morality. Recognizing equal rights for children is likely to worsen this situation, not make it better
Liberation · Morality · Political science · Prudence · Sociology · Theology · Women's Liberation · Chemistry · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |