The Woman and Her Obscure Versions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12147446 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Celenis Rodríguez Moreno (Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, corresponding author), Alejandro Montelongo González (0000-0003-0707-3715, Autonomous University of Aguascalientes) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 566-581 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hypatia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-5367 • E-ISSN: 1527-2001 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/hyp.2022.34 |
| OpenAlex | W4312970040 |
| Language | EN |
The objective of this article is to analyze the production of the subject Woman by reviewing some practices, discourses, and technologies promoted by the state, the church, and elites. It is important to emphasize that in most research about women or femininity, female subjectivity appears tightly linked to sexual difference. However, in this work I want to show that the notion of Woman is co-determined by race and class. The experience characteristic of such representation was possible only for a small group of white and bourgeois women. Others—Indian, black, and mestiza “women”—could hardly account for a social experience comparable to the Western narrative about woman. Nevertheless, processes of homogenization allow these others to be classified and disciplined according to the gender norm, yet without altering the prejudices and inequalities produced by the prevailing racist and classist system, which implies the production of other female subjectivities, of other “women.”
Art · Epistemology · Femininity · Inequality · Literature · Narrative · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Sociology · Subjectivity · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|