A Reply to Laura Purdy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12147802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nancy Tuana (0000-0001-5449-6097, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 175-178 |
| Publication date | 1986-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hypatia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-5367 • E-ISSN: 1527-2001 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1986.tb00528.x |
| OpenAlex | W2066397282 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
This essay is a response to the comments and critique of Laura Purdy to my earlier paper “Re‐Fusing Nature/Nurture” (1983, 621–632). In it I re‐emphasize that the traditional nature/nurture dichotomy is based upon an unacceptable ontology and briefly note the type of metaphysic that would serve as a more appropriate basis
Biology · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Nature versus nurture · Ontology · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Genetics
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,03 |
| Citation span | 1989 - 1989 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |