Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Communist Legacies and Democratic Survival in a Comparative Perspective

Liability or Advantage

Bibliographic Data

ID12149259
AuthorsJeff Carter (0000-0001-7681-4973, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA, corresponding author), Markus Bernhard (0000-0002-0030-1693, University of Florida), Michael H Bernhard (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA), Timothy Nordstrom (0000-0002-1264-9590, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA)
Year2016
Volume30
Issue4
Pages830-854
Publication date2016-08-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEast European Politics and Societies and Cultures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0888-3254 • E-ISSN: 1533-8371
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0888325416659109
OpenAlexW2514342695
LanguageEN
Citations received6

The literature on the legacies of communism for democratization has focused almost exclusively on explaining variation in the democratic experiences within the postcommunist space. While this is useful in many ways, it says little about a communist legacy in comparison to other types of antecedent regimes. We take a different approach, looking at the question by comparing postcommunist legacies to those of other states through the prism of democratic survival. One key implication of this shift in perspective is that the literature on democratic survival highlights a range of social and economic factors that are likely to help postcommunist democracies survive, which stands in stark contrast to the postcommunist democratic performance literature that emphasizes potential disadvantages. We assess these competing and contradictory implications by analyzing the relative likelihood of democratic survival using a sample of all third-wave democracies from 1970 to 2010. We find that postcommunist democracies are neither systematically more nor less likely to fail than other democracies. Further, we find no evidence that the prospects of failure are significantly affected by past membership in the Soviet Union or the Eastern Bloc, the type of communist regime, or the number of years under communist rule. These findings provide little evidence that the problems of postcommunist democratization pose a more difficult set of conditions for democratic survival

Communism · Democracy · Democratization · Development economics · Economics · Perspective (graphical · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Law · Soviet and Russian History

  • Democratic resilience and re-democratisation

    Open Access•Licia Cianetti•East European Politics•2026

  • Popular Legal Attitudes and the Political Order

    William M Reisinger, Marina Zaloznaya et al.•Europe Asia Studies•2020

  • The structural sources of postcommunist regime trajectories

    Lucan A Way, Adam E Casey et al.•Post-Soviet Affairs•2018

  • Born with a silver spoon? Modes of transitions and democratic survival

    Huang-Ting Yan•Democratization•2024

  • Dead But Not Gone

    Alberto Simpser, Dan Slater et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Communist Legacy, Anti-Elite Sentiments, and Modernization Theory

    Olga Vasilyeva, Alexander Libman•Communist and Post-Communist…•2024

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,75
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae