Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Opening, Polling, Counting

Deterring Election-Day Fraud

Bibliographic Data

ID12149497
AuthorsMarta Regalia (0000-0002-5405-0906, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Italy, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume38
Issue1
Pages218-238
Publication date2023-10-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEast European Politics and Societies and Cultures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0888-3254 • E-ISSN: 1533-8371
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/08883254231203337
OpenAlexW4388270961
LanguageEN

International election observation has been scrutinized over the past two decades by scholars trying to explain its aim, scope, and consequences. As it is now a standard practice in democratizing countries, scholarly literature has almost reached a consensus on the ability of observers to deter election-day fraud, one of the most positive unintended consequences of election observation. Using data from the 2004 Ukraine presidential election, this article extends our knowledge through a natural experiment on polling station-level election results. I will show that observation during counting does not have a stronger effect than observation during opening and/or polling. Results support previous studies showing the usefulness of election observation in reducing election-day fraud but add an important finding that deserves further scholarly attention

General election · Political science · Politics · Polling · Presidential election · Scope (computer science · Computer Science · Corruption and Economic Development · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae