Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Parties, Democracy, and the Ideal of Anti-factionalism

Past Anxieties and Present Challenges

Bibliographic Data

ID12159206
AuthorsDavid Ragazzoni (0000-0002-9697-308X, Columbia University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume36
Issue4
Pages475-485
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics & International Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0892-6794 • E-ISSN: 1747-7093
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s089267942200051x
OpenAlexW4312830817
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

This essay weaves together the history of political and legal thought, contemporary democratic theory, and recent debates in legal scholarship to examine the ambivalent relationship between political parties and democracy. Celebrated as a structural necessity for the mechanics of democratic government, political parties are also handled with suspicion for their hybrid nature—neither entirely public nor completely private—and for their always-possible regression into factions. Anti-factionalism, I show, has been a powerful ideal driving constitutional imagination and practice over the centuries, from antiquity (with its emphasis on parts and its horror over factions), to the age of democratic revolutions (with its signature anxieties about divisions), up through the present. However, this long historical process has not extinguished the long-lived concern with the nature and implications of party spirit, nor has it made party democracy completely safe from revamped forms of factionalism. Two manifestations of factional politics stand out in the contemporary political landscape: authoritarian regime changes and populist constitutionalism. While the former is easy to diagnose but hard to prevent, the latter exemplifies a torsion of the constitutional and democratic imagination from within. Despite their differences, both scenarios remind us that constitutions need to envision mechanisms to prevent parties from undermining the liberal democratic order they have been designed to serve. At the same time, they call for renewed attention to the study of parties in the domains of democratic theory and constitutional scholarship

Ambivalence · Authoritarianism · Constitutionalism · Democracy · Ideal (ethics · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Reflections on the concept of subject

    Open Access•Michela Luzi•Frontiers in Sociology•2026

  • Constitutionalism and the separation of powers

    M J C Vile•Constitutionalism and the…•1967

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae