Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Imperfect Longitudinal Social Science Data for Sound Protected Area Management and Governance

Bibliographic Data

ID12163052
AuthorsBeatrice Frank (0000-0002-4326-2567, Capital Regional District, Regional Parks, Canada, corresponding author), Michael Walton (0000-0001-9129-8313, Outdoor Recreation, Parks and Tourism, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada)
Year2022
Volume35
Issue10
Pages1134-1149
Publication date2022-07-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety & Natural Resources (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-1920 • E-ISSN: 1521-0723
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08941920.2022.2105460
OpenAlexW4288535630
LanguageEN
References cited35

Information about the intensity, direction and degree of change of park users' perceptions of protected areas (PAs) over time offers insights about their relevance to those visitors and can inform elements of good governance and management. The resident surveys data collected in 1992, 1998, 2005 and 2017 by Regional Parks of the Capital Regional District of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, show how imperfect longitudinal social science information helped park managers identify trends, patterns and key areas of public support, thus set robust and effective priorities, policies and strategies for the regional park system. Collecting data where all information relevant to a decision is known and available is often beyond the ability of practitioners. We offer insights on how to best use imperfect longitudinal social science data and help practitioners consider what is necessary to support sounds decision-making for PAs management and governance. Implications of RehabilitationUnderstanding the social dimensions and processes affecting PAs governance and management through longitudinal social science data helps set more robust and effective priorities, policies, actions and outcomes;Establishing longitudinal social science data should be a basic research requisite when developing PA conservation and environmental management strategies, even when the dataset obtained are not always complete or perfectly comparable;Imperfect data, when providing longitudinal information that allow to identify trends, patterns and key areas to focus on, can support sound decision making for PAs;We suggest practitioners consider what they really need to support decision-making, acknowledge the imperfections of their data and consider that some level of uncertainty exists, even with "perfect" data

Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental resource management · Imperfect · Knowledge management · Political science · Relevance (law · Set (abstract data type · Computer Science · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Urban Green Space and Health · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

  • Conducting Research in Conservation

    Helen Newing•Conducting Research In Conservation•2010

  • On the History and Present Condition of Geography

    D C Harvey, David Harvey•The Professional Geographer•1984

  • Environmental governance

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett, Terre Satterfield•Conservation Letters•2018

  • Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

    Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  • Assessing the impact of international conservation aid on deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Matthew Bare, Craig M Kauffman et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Advances in monitoring the human dimension of natural resource systems

    Open Access•Neil Marshall, N A Marshall et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2016

  • Protected areas and the sustainable governance of forest resources

    Open Access•D C Miller, Katia Nakamura•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • Poverty and protected areas

    Open Access•Georgina G Gurney, Joshua Cinner et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Linking multi-level governance to local common-pool resource theory using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

    Open Access•Xavier Basurto•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Longitudinal Social Science Research in Natural Resource Communities

    Melanie Stidham, Christine S Olsen et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2014

  • Public Support for Land Acquisition

    Beatrice Frank, Michael Walton et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2019

  • Remembered experiences and revisit intentions

    Open Access•Steven J Barne, Stuart J Barnes et al.•Tourism Management•2016

  • Environmental Concern Over Time

    Open Access•Gabriella Melis, Mark Elliot et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2014

  • Where Do We Go from Here? Nonresponse and Social Measurement

    Open Access•D S Massey, Roger Tourangeau•The Annals of the American…•2013

  • Community empowerment for managing wild boar

    Open Access•Stefano Giacomelli, Michael Gibbert et al.•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • Panel Conditioning in Longitudinal Social Science Surveys

    Open Access•J R Warren, A Halpern-Manners•Sociological Methods & Research•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae