Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Organizational learning about environmental risk communication

The case of Rohm and Haas’ Bristol plant

Bibliographic Data

ID12163144
AuthorsCaron Chess (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author), Michal Tamuz (The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston), Michael R Greenberg (0000-0002-2576-9794, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Michael Greenberg
Year1995
Volume8
Issue1
Pages57-66
Publication date1995-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety & Natural Resources (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-1920 • E-ISSN: 1521-0723
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08941929509380900
OpenAlexW2086485398
LanguageEN
References cited16

Corporations, particularly those in the chemical industry, have embarked on a major effort to increase their environmental credibility with the public. As a result, many companies are reaching out beyond their gates to increase dialogue with communities and environmentalists. Although many corporations have attempted to improve the communication skills of individual managers, little attention has been paid to improving how the company, as an organization, learns to improve communication practices in general, and environmental risk communication in particular. In this article, we discuss how one plant's process of learning about risk communication might inform organizational learning about communicating with communities about environmental concerns. We found that organizational learning was complex, and that different sub‐units learned different lessons and at different rates. Learning from crises, experience, and the experience of other organizations are discussed. This research suggests that corporations that grapple with organizational issues are more likely to succeed in their efforts to communicate about environmental issues

Business · Communication skills · Credibility · Environmental communication · Knowledge management · Organizational communication · Organizational learning · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk communication · Computer Science · Management and Organizational Studies · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Risk Perception and Management

  • Organizational Learning

    Barbara Levitt, James G March•Annual Review of Sociology•1988

  • Ambiguity and choice in organizations

    James G March•Ambiguity and choice in…•1979

  • Learning from Samples of One or Fewer

    James G March, Lee Sproull et al.•Organization Science•1991

  • Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments.

    Kathleen M Eisenhardt•Academy of Management Journal•1989

  • Communicating Risks to the Public

    Open Access•P J Stallen, Roger E Kasperson et al.•Communicating Risks to the Public•1991

  • Improving Risk Communication

    Open Access•Ralph L Keeney, Detlof von Winterfeldt•Risk Analysis•1986

  • Building 6

    Herbert K Abrams, W Sidney Randall et al.•Journal of Public Health Policy•1980

  • Chemical industry accidents, liability, and community right to know

    Michael Baram, M S Baram•American Journal of Public Health•1986

  • Optimistic biases in public perceptions of the risk from radon

    N D Weinstein, M L Klotz et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1988

  • Rohm and Haas

    John A Heitmann, Sheldon Hochheiser•Technology and Culture•1988

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae