Is Resident Valuation of Ranch Open Space Robust in a Growing Rural Community? Evidence From the Rocky Mountains
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12163345 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Magnan (0000-0002-5294-2126, International Food Policy Research Institute, corresponding author), Andrew Seidl (0000-0002-2338-1307, International Union for Conservation of Nature), Andrew F Seidl, John B Loomis (Colorado State University) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 852-867 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Society & Natural Resources (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-1920 • E-ISSN: 1521-0723 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08941920.2011.642459 |
| OpenAlex | W2072962431 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 27 |
The conversion of ranch open space to development uses is common in rural areas experiencing rapid growth, often due to in-migration. There is concern that a growing and changing population could alter community preferences regarding development, permanently changing the physical and social landscape. This study investigates the nonmarket value of ranch open space to residents of an amenity-rich county in the Rocky Mountains (USA) using survey data from 1994 and 2004. We find that on that, on average, there was no difference in what residents were willing to pay for ranch open space conservation between the two years, and that income has a positive effect on willingness to pay. Because the population of the county is growing and average willingness to pay has stayed constant, aggregate willingness to pay for public ranch open space has increased, leading to greater total social benefits of public conservation initiatives
Agricultural economics · Amenity · Business · Contingent valuation · Economics · Geography · Nonmarket forces · Population · Public open space · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Valuation (finance · Willingness to pay · Demography · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Housing Market and Economics · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Marketing
Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses
The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values
Incentive and informational properties of preference questions
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
The contingent valuation method
Mountain Resort Planning and Development in an Era of Globalization
The practice of social research
The Dynamics of Land Development in Resort Communities
The Contingent Valuation Debate
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |