Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Concurrent Governance Processes of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act

Bibliographic Data

ID12165376
AuthorsAnita Milman (0000-0002-5712-9388, Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, corresponding author), Michael Kiparsky (0000-0002-1910-8885, Wheeler Water Institute, Center for Law, Energy and the Environment, School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA)
Year2020
Volume33
Issue12
Pages1555-1566
Publication date2020-02-19
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety & Natural Resources (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-1920 • E-ISSN: 1521-0723
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08941920.2020.1725696
OpenAlexW3008902071
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited29

California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) is a landmark policy that requires achievement of sustainability at the groundwater basin level. In this policy review and analysis, we describe the horizontal, vertical, and network governance processes occurring under SGMA and discuss how they interact with one another. In doing so, we review existing governance theories that can help to shed light on how each governance process may unfold. Depicting SGMA as a complex system of simultaneous and interacting governance processes provides a useful platform for future evaluations of SGMA successes and failures as well as for transferring lessons learned from California’s implementation of SGMA to groundwater governance in other locations

Business · Corporate governance · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Groundwater · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Structural basin · Sustainability · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Environmental Science · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Ecology · Geology

  • Shaping Collaborative Actions in Self‐Initiated Versus Mandated Collaborations

    Open Access•Jie Wang, Nicola Ulibarri•Policy Studies Journal•2026

  • Sustainable Groundwater Management in California

    Mark Lubell, William Blomquist et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2020

  • Networks in Public Administration

    Jesse D Lecy, Ines Mergel et al.•Public Management Review•2014

  • Environmental Governance

    Open Access•Maria Carmen Lemos, Arun Agrawal•Annual Review of Environment and…•2006

  • Groundwater — a global focus on the ‘local resource’

    Open Access•Stephen Foster, John Chilton et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2013

  • Institutional fit and the sustainability of social–ecological systems

    Open Access•Gerald Epstein, Jeremy Pittman et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2015

  • Network Governance of the Commons

    Open Access•Lars Gunnar Carlsson, Annica Sandström•International Journal of the…•2007

  • Implementing Federal Policy

    Open Access•Sara Dahill-Brown, Lesley Lavery•Politics & Policy•2012

  • Burning through organizational boundaries? Examining inter-organizational communication networks in policy-mandated collaborative bushfire planning groups

    Open Access•Rachel F Brummel, Kristen C Nelson et al.•Global Environmental Change•2012

  • Local Commitment to State-Mandated Planning in Coastal North Carolina

    Open Access•Richard K Norton•Journal of Planning Education and…•2005

  • Impacts of Federal and State Hazard Mitigation Policies on Local Land Use Policy

    Open Access•Philip R Berke, Philip Berke et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2014

  • Rational Choice and Regional Governance

    Richard Feiock•Journal of Urban Affairs•2007

  • Overcoming the Barriers to Cooperation

    Open Access•Seok-Woo Kwon, Sung-Wook Kwon et al.•Public Administration Review•2010

  • Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement Public Policies

    Open Access•Lidewij Tummers, Bram Steijn et al.•Public Administration•2012

  • The future of environmental networks—Governance and civil society in a global context

    Open Access•David L Feldman•Futures•2012

  • The New Governance

    Open Access•Roderick A W Rhodes•Political Studies•1996

  • Understanding Policy Networks

    Open Access•D Marsh, Martin J Smith et al.•Political Studies•2000

  • The Institutional Collective Action Framework

    Open Access•Richard C Feiock, Richard Feiock•Policy Studies Journal•2013

  • Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox

    Open Access•Tyler Andrew Scott, Craig W Thomas•Policy Studies Journal•2017

  • And the rest is implementation.’ Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond Great Expectations

    Open Access•Peter Hupe, Peter L Hupe et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2016

  • Governance Innovation and the Citizen

    Open Access•E Swyngedouw•Urban Studies•2005

  • Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science

    Open Access•David H Guston•Science Technology & Human Values•2001

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae