Do patients trust computers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12166229 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marianne Promberger (California University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), Jonathan Baron (0000-0003-1001-9947, California University of Pennsylvania) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 455-468 |
| Publication date | 2006-11-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bdm.542 |
| OpenAlex | W2070125214 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 42 |
| References cited | 30 |
In two studies, we inquired whether patients accept medical recommendations that come from a computer program rather than from a physician. In study 1, we found that subjects, when deciding whether to have an operation or not in different medical scenarios, were more likely to follow a recommendation that came from a physician than one that came from a computer program. Subjects stated that they would feel less responsible when following a recommendation than when deciding against it. Following a physician's recommendation reduced the feeling of responsibility more than following that of a computer program. The difference in feeling of responsibility when following versus when not following a recommendation partly mediated subjects' inclination to follow the physician more. In our second study, we found that subjects were more decision seeking when they received a recommendation or decision from a computer program, and they were more decision seeking when they had to accept a decision than when they received a recommendation. Subjects also trusted the physician more than the computer program to make a good recommendation or decision. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Family medicine · Feeling · Medical decision making · Medical education · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion
My Friends, Editors, Algorithms, and I
Algorithm appreciation
Do We Trust Artificially Intelligent Assistants at Work? An Experimental Study
Students’ acceptance on computer-adaptive testing for achievement assessment in Japanese elementary and secondary school
Investigating lay evaluations of models
Birds of a feather? How perceived similarity shapes responses to AI versus human health messages
AI as a moral crumple zone
When humans and computers induce social stress through negative feedback
To err is human, not algorithmic – Robust reactions to erring algorithms
Gain-loss separability in human- but not computer-based changes of mind
Let me decide
The future of artificial intelligence at work
Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures
Biased Humans, (Un)Biased Algorithms
The effect of medical artificial intelligence innovation locus on consumer adoption of new products
Managerial overreliance on AI-augmented decision-making processes
What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion
Black Box Warfare
Americans’ views of artificial intelligence
The ABC of algorithmic aversion
Put Yourself in My Shoes
Trade-offs in AI assistant choice
The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments
What People Want From Their Professionals
Artificial intelligence innovation in healthcare
Machine Replacement
Counselor type (Human/AI) and consultation intention
The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
Artificial intelligence in medicine
Paging Dr. Jarvis! Will people accept advice from artificial intelligence for consequential risk management decisions
The Effect of Intuitive Advice Justification on Advice Taking
A longitudinal approach for understanding algorithm use
Algorithms in selection decisions
Beware the performance of an algorithm before relying on it
Misperception of Multiple Risks in Medical Decision-Making
Explainability increases trust resilience in intelligent agents
Trust in AI vs. human doctors
Same, same, but different! Qualitative evidence on how algorithmic selection applications govern different life domains
Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence
Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence
Clinical versus statistical prediction
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions
Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgment
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.
Psychological determinants of decision attitude
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
| Unique citing works | 42 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,47 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2026 (18) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 42 |