Money does not stink
Using unpleasant odors as stimulus material changes risky decision making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12166276 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bettina von Helversen (0000-0003-2004-6922, Department of Psychology University of Bremen Bremen Germany, corresponding author), Géraldine Coppin (0000-0002-7848-3298, Department of Psychology University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland), Benjamin Scheibehenne (Faculty of Economics and Management University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 593-605 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bdm.2178 |
| OpenAlex | W3012864278 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 53 |
Odors are strong elicitors of affect, and they play an important role in guiding human behavior, such as avoiding fire or spoiled food. However, little is known about how risky decision making changes when stimuli are olfactory. We investigated this question in an experimental study of risky decision making with unpleasant odors and monetary losses in a fully incentivized task with real outcomes. Odor and monetary decisions were matched so that monetary losses corresponded to the amount of money participants were willing to pay to avoid smelling an odor. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses using prospect theory show that participants were less sensitive to probabilities when gambling with odors than when gambling with money. These results highlight the importance of taking the sensory modality into account when studying risky decision making
Affect (linguistics · Cognitive psychology · Economics · Odor · Olfaction · Sensory system · Stimulus (psychology · Stimulus modality · Communication · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Multisensory perception and integration · Neuroscience · Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies · Psychology
The attention–aversion gap
Reward currency modulates human risk preferences
Choices, Values, and Frames
Music, Pandas, and Muggers
Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method
Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks
Advances in prospect theory
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Affective dimensions of odor perception
Many Labs 2
Feeling the Numbers
Decisions from Experience
How Affect Shapes Risky Choice
Visceral influences on risk‐taking behavior
Impact of a non-attentively perceived odour on subsequent food choices
Probability weighting in different domains
Differential use of sensory information in sexual behavior as a function of gender
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2022 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |