Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beliefs about what types of mechanisms produce random sequences

Bibliographic Data

ID12166327
AuthorsDeborah S Blinder (Princeton University), Daniel M Oppenheimer (0000-0002-2363-4220, Princeton University, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume21
Issue4
Pages414-427
Publication date2008-03-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.596
OpenAlexW2149197132
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited24

Although many researchers use Wagenaar's framework for understanding the factors that people use to determine whether a process is random, the framework has never undergone empirical scrutiny. This paper uses Wagenaar's framework as a starting point and examines the three properties of his framework—independence of events, fixed alternatives, and equiprobability. We find strong evidence to suggest that independence of events is indeed used as a cue toward randomness. Equiprobability has an effect on randomness judgments. However, it appears to work only in a limited role. Fixedness of alternatives is a complex construct that consists of multiple sub‐concepts. We find that each of these sub‐concepts influences randomness judgments, but that they exert forces in different directions. Stability of outcome ratios increases randomness judgments, while knowledge of outcome ratios decreases randomness judgments. Future directions for development of a functional framework for understanding perceptions of randomness are suggested. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Construct (python library · Econometrics · Epistemology · Independence (probability theory · Mathematical economics · Outcome (game theory · Perception · Political science · Process (computing · Randomness · Range (aeronautics · Scrutiny · Statistics · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Sports Analytics and Performance

  • What's next? Judging sequences of binary events

    An T Oskarsson, Leaf Van Boven et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making

    Open Access•Norbert Schwarz•Journal of Consumer Psychology•2004

  • The hot hand in basketball

    Open Access•Thomas Gilovich, Robert P Vallone et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1985

  • Generation of random sequences by human subjects

    W A Wagenaar•Psychological Bulletin•1972

  • Randomness and randomizers

    Open Access•Willem A Wagenaar•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1991

  • Psychological conceptions of randomness

    Open Access•Peter Ayton, Anne J Hunt et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1989

  • The Theory of Probability

    Donald C Williams, Hans Reichenbach et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1950

  • The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children

    Joan Tamburrini, Jean Piaget et al.•British Journal of Educational…•1976

  • Belief in the law of small numbers

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Bulletin•1971

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,06
Citation span2009 - 2009 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae