Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences in the importance of work outcomes between full‐time and part‐time hospital employees

Bibliographic Data

ID12168519
AuthorsDouglas S Wakefield (University of Iowa, corresponding author), JAMES P CURRY (University of Iowa), Charles W Mueller (0000-0002-8182-3281, University of Iowa), James L Price (University of Iowa)
Year1987
Volume8
Issue1
Pages25-35
Publication date1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Organizational Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3796 • E-ISSN: 1099-1379
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/job.4030080104
OpenAlexW2152922159
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited8

This study examined differences in the importance of work outcomes between full‐time and part‐time hospital employees in a sample drawn from five western hospitals ( N = 1,876). Work status was operationalized by classifying respondents into four categories based on hours worked per week. Exploratory factor analysis showed that work outcomes may be classified as extrinsic (pay and fringe benefits) and instrinsic (being informed about the job, participating in decision‐making, and doing the job well). Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that this two‐factor structure fits the data well for all four work status categories although the factor loadings differed across categories. Multivariate analyses of variance and covariance indicated that statistically significant differences in the importance of extrinsic and intrinsic outcomes exist for full‐time and part‐time employees and that these differences persist when various social and demographic variables are held constant. Employees who work fewer hours per week tend to assign less importance to the work outcomes measured in this study. The results suggest that theoretical models of variables such as job satisfaction should take into account work status differences in the importance of work‐related outcomes. In addition, managers may find that workers respond to different reward structures depending on the degree of their involvement in the organization

Confirmatory factor analysis · Developmental psychology · Explained variation · Exploratory factor analysis · Full-time · Job satisfaction · Multivariate analysis · Multivariate statistics · Operationalization · Psychometrics · Sample (material · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Variance (accounting · Work (physics · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology · Workplace Health and Well-being

  • Measuring work motivation

    Open Access•A Furnham, Ian Macrae et al.•Scandinavian Journal of Psychology•2021

  • Differences between full‐time and part‐time employees in perceived role strain and work satisfaction

    Open Access•Brian D Steffy, John W Jones•Journal of Organizational Behavior•1990

  • Occupational suitability bias for full-time and part-time employment in sex-typed jobs

    Open Access•Nicholas Ward, Nicholas John Ward•Sex Roles•1991

  • Prisoners’ Perspectives on Limited Rehabilitative Program Opportunities

    Open Access•Kerry Edwards•Qualitative Report•2021

  • Perceived organizational support and work status

    Open Access•Anika Gakovic, Lois E Tetrick•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2003

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,14
Citation span1990 - 2021 (32)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae