Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Where Should I Start? On Default Values for Slider Questions in Web Surveys

Bibliographic Data

ID12170754
AuthorsMingnan Liu (Facebook, Menlo Park, CA, USA, corresponding author), Frederick G Conrad (0000-0002-1933-3273, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)
Year2018
Volume37
Issue2
Pages248-269
Publication date2018-02-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science Computer Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-4393 • E-ISSN: 1552-8286
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0894439318755336
OpenAlexW2793809967
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited13

Web surveys have expanded the set of options available to questionnaire designers. One new option is to make it possible to administer questions that respondents can answer by moving an on-screen slider to the position on a visual scale that best reflects their position on an underlying dimension. One attribute of sliders that is not well understood is how the position of the slider when the question is presented can affect responses—for better or worse. Yet the slider’s default position is under the control of the designer and can potentially be exploited to maximize the quality of the responses (e.g., positioning the slider by default at the midpoint on the assumption that this is unbiased). There are several studies in the methodology literature that compare data collected via sliders and other methods, but relatively little attention has been given to the issue of default slider values. The current article reports findings from four web survey experiments ( n = 3,744, 490, 697, and 902) that examine whether and how the default values of the slider influence responses. For 101-point questions (e.g., feeling thermometers), when the slider default values are set to be 25, 50, 75, or 100, significantly more respondents choose those values as their answers which seems unlikely to accurately reflect respondents’ actual position on the underlying dimension. For 21- and 7-point scales, there is no significant or consistent impact of the default slider value on answers. The completion times are also similar across default values for questions with scales of this type. When sliders do not appear by default at any value, that is, the respondent must click or touch the scale to activate the slider, the missing data rate is low for 21- and 7-point scales but higher for the 101-point scales. Respondents’ evaluation of the survey difficulty and their satisfaction level with the survey do not differ by the default values. The implications and limitations of the findings are discussed

Business · Dimension (graph theory · Feeling · Machine learning · Physics · Point (geometry · Position (finance · Quality (philosophy · Scale (ratio · Set (abstract data type · Slider · Value (mathematics · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Engineering · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Depression and suicidality as evolved credible signals of need in social conflicts

    Open Access•Michael R Gaffney, Kai H Adams et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2022

  • Attention matters—but only for the obvious

    Open Access•Robin Burda, Jan Kleiner et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Plenty of blame to go around

    Open Access•Christopher J Copp, Jean J Cabell et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Too old for a circular solar economy? Age dynamics in the acceptance of solar and circular value propositions

    Open Access•Wim Van Opstal•Technological Forecasting and…•2025

  • The Roles of Civil Society Associations in Organising the Informal Circular Economy

    Open Access•Wim Van Opstal, Nancy Bocken et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Inferences about event outcomes influence text-based memory of event outcomes

    Open Access•Xinyan Kou, Jill Hohenstein•Cognitive Linguistics•2024

  • Slider Bars in Multi-Device Web Surveys

    Open Access•Angelica M Maineri, Angelica Maineri et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2019

  • Kinesthetic Properties of Response Scales Yield Different Judgments

    Open Access•Melanie S Brucks, Jonathan Levav et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2025

  • Score Reliability in Webor Internet-Based Surveys

    Open Access•Colleen Cook, Fred Heath et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2001

  • Sliders for the Smart

    Open Access•Frederik Funke, Ulf-Dietrich Reips et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2010

  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales

    Open Access•Mick P Couper, Roger Tourangeau et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2006

  • Making Mobile Browser Surveys Smarter

    Open Access•Trent D Buskirk, Charles H Andrus•CAM•2014

  • Why Semantic Differentials in Web-Based Research Should Be Made from Visual Analogue Scales and Not from 5-Point Scales

    Open Access•Frederik Funke, Ulf-Dietrich Reips•CAM•2012

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,14
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae