Thinking Nonsociologically about Sociological Law
[Rejoinder]
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12176019 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Constable (0000-0002-3950-4412, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 625-625 |
| Publication date | 1994-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Social Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0897-6546 • E-ISSN: 1747-4469 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/492477 |
| OpenAlex | W2030111071 |
| Language | EN |
At stake is justice, a topic about which both Austin Sarat5 and Kenneth Cmiel,6 probably quite rightly, would like to hear more. Genealogy and Jurisprudence suggests that contemporary law (legal discourse, legal institutions), as revealed in a variety of legal texts, increasingly appeals to knowledges of society (social sciences or sociology). As this occurs, the relations between law and sociology become such that justice-understood as the
Epistemology · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |