Just Because You're Paranoid Doesn't Mean They Aren't Out to Get You
Rejoinder to Bensel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12178918 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samuel Decanio (0000-0002-4722-9326, Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 200-205 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in American Political Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0898-588X • E-ISSN: 1469-8692 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0898588x11000083 |
| OpenAlex | W2318628669 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Richard Bensel's comment on my article “Populism, Paranoia, and the Politics of Free Silver” is, like all of his writing, thoughtful, careful, detailed, and well written. However, I find that I disagree with a number of Bensel's points. In this response I try to clarify areas of disagreement and point to several cases where I believe my argument has been slightly misconstrued, which is understandable given the length and complexity of the paper
Argument (complex analysis · Economics · Epistemology · Paranoia · Point (geometry · Political science · Politics · Populism · Positive economics · Psychotherapist · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Political Economy and Marxism · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |