Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jus Cogens after Germany v. Italy

Substantive and Procedural Rules Distinguished

Bibliographic Data

ID12186294
AuthorsStefan Talmon (corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume25
Issue4
Pages979-1002
Publication date2012-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLeiden Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0922-1565 • E-ISSN: 1478-9698
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0922156512000532
OpenAlexW3121161997
LanguageEN
References cited22

In the case concerning Jurisdictional Immunities of the State , the ICJ held that rules of jus cogens did not automatically displace hierarchically lower rules of state immunity. The Court's decision was based on the rationale that there was no conflict between these rules as the former were substantive rules while the latter were procedural in character. The ‘substantive–procedural’ distinction has been heavily criticized in the literature. Much of the criticism seems to be motivated by the unwanted result of the distinction, namely de facto impunity for the most serious human rights violations. This paper takes a step back from the alleged antinomy of human rights and state immunity and broadens the picture by looking at the relationship between substantive and procedural rules more generally. It is shown that substantive rules of a jus cogens character generally leave procedural rules unaffected and, in particular, do not automatically override such rules. Substantive rules may, however, have a limited effect upon the interpretation and application of procedural rules. It is argued that the ‘substantive–procedural’ distinction is well established in international law and makes eminent sense even when substantive rules of jus cogens and procedural rules of immunity are involved

Antinomy · Epistemology · Human rights · Interpretation (philosophy · Jurisdiction · Law and economics · Political science · Procedural law · Sociology · State (computer science · State immunity · Substantive law · Substantive rights · Computer Science · European and International Law Studies · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Philosophy

  • Jurisdiction and Admissibility

    David Aled Williams, David A R Williams•The Oxford Handbook of…•2012

  • Die Tyrannei der Werte

    Carl Schmitt•Die Tyrannei der Werte•2011

  • The Statute of the International Court of Justice

    Bing Bing Jia•Chinese Journal of International…•2006

  • When May Senior State Officials Be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on the Congo v. Belgium Case

    A Cassese•European Journal of International…•2002

  • Torture and State Immunity

    Lorna McGregor•European Journal of International…•2007

  • The Invocation of Responsibility for the Breach of 'Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law

    Iain Scobbie•European Journal of International…•2002

  • State Immunity and Hierarchy of Norms

    Alexander Orakhelashvili•European Journal of International…•2007

  • Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens

    Andrea Bianchi•European Journal of International…•2008

  • Forbidden Treaties in International Law

    Open Access•Alfred Verdross, Alfred von Verdross•American Journal of International…•1937

  • The International Court and ‘Its Freedom to Select the Ground Upon Which it Will Base its Judgment’

    Open Access•Alexander Orakhelashvili•International and Comparative Law…•2007

  • State Immunity, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens

    Open Access•Lee M Caplan•American Journal of International…•2003

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae