The Bosnia Genocide Case

The Bosnia Genocide case dealt with several important matters of international law, apart from the issue of responsibility proper for genocide. The Court began by addressing issues of state succession in order to identify the proper respondent. It then found that the objection to jurisdiction raised by the respondent was res judicata . It held that the Genocide Convention created state responsibility in addition to international criminal responsibility of the individual. The contribution of the judgment to the law of evidence, in particular with reference to the standard and methods of proof, is significant. Finally, the Court applied the codification by the International Law Commission of attribution in state responsibility to the situation before it in deciding that the genocidal acts subject of the case were not attributable to Serbia, while also holding that Serbia was, nevertheless, responsible for omitting to prevent genocide

Commission · Convention · Genocide · International law · Jurisdiction · Political science · Res judicata · Respondent · Responsibility to Protect · State (computer science · State responsibility · European and International Law Studies · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law

• Precarious Finality? Reflections on Res Judicata and the Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Case

  Open Access•Niccolò Ridi•Leiden Journal of International Law•2018

  Add to list