The Security Council's Targeted Sanctions Regimes

In Need of Better Protection of the Individual

Bibliographic Data

ID12187447
AuthorsLarissa van den Herik (0000-0002-2301-1322, Leiden University, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume20
Issue4
Pages797-807
Publication date2007-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLeiden Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0922-1565 • E-ISSN: 1478-9698
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0922156507004451
OpenAlexW2134565254
LanguageEN
Citations received5

This contribution examines the problem of review of targeted sanctions imposed by the Security Council in the light of recent developments occurring in the EU context. Some recent judgments of the European Court of First Instance of the European Communities (CFI) are analysed, as rendered in the cases of Yusuf and Kadi and also in the more recent cases of the Mujaheddeen and Sison . These last two judgments show that flaws in the targeted sanctions regimes exist not only at UN level. The CFI also does not substantively review the listing when this listing is carried out by the Council of the EU. An examination of the progress made at UN level to address procedural flaws shows that, more than anything else, the real stumbling-block is the lack of a substantive review of intelligence information by an independent and impartial organ. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that we are on the way towards a better de-listing procedure, but are not there yet

Business · Context (archaeology · Economics · Geography · Law and economics · Listing (finance · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sanctions · Security council · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · European and International Law Studies · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Finance

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access