Accepting the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice with Reservations
An Overview of Practice with a Focus on Recent Trends and Cases
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12187728 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stanimir A Alexandrov (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 89-124 |
| Publication date | 2001-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Leiden Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0922-1565 • E-ISSN: 1478-9698 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s092215650100005x |
| OpenAlex | W2168383073 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
States can accept the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice with respect to all or certain categories of legal disputes by means of unilateral declarations. This article examines the reservations to the acceptance of the compulsory jurisdiction that states include in such declarations. It reviews the practice of states and traces the trends in drafting and adopting reservations. It also analyzes the jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice in relation to the interpretation of various reservations, particularly in recent cases, illustrating the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of different types of reservations
Economic Justice · International court · International law · Interpretation (philosophy · Jurisdiction · Jurisprudence · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Public international law · Relation (database · Subject-matter jurisdiction · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · International Maritime Law Issues · Law
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |