Applied Legal Hermeneutics in 18th-Century Fes

The present study is an analysis of a treatise ( risāla ) by the 18th-century Mālikī al-Tāwudī in which he discusses a doctrinal detail regarding bayʿ al-thunyā , a common stratagem to circumvent the prohibition of interest. I use al-Tāwudī’s text as a lens to reconstruct the hermeneutical perspective of a Muslim jurist of the late premodern era. In the first section, I show that al-Tāwudī’s legal reasoning is strongly informed by the legacy of Mālikī discourse on bayʿ al-thunya , which is one of constant disagreement over the acceptability of the institution. In the course of this conflict, various doctrinal compromises were negotiated, only to be challenged again by the invention of new stratagems or by rigorist backlashes. Al-Tāwudī’s treatise must be understood as part of this doctrinal tug of war. In the second section, I analyze al-Tāwudī’s epistemological premises. I show that his legal reasoning is strictly exegetical, except that the object of this exegesis is not Qurʾān and Sunna, as proposed in classical uṣūl al-fiqh , but the school’s literary corpus. This corpus, in turn, is hierarchically structured. It consists of many layers of texts, accumulated over centuries and tightly interwoven by intertextual references, with certain texts enjoying a particularly authoritative status. Against this background, reasoning becomes a game of artful referencing. Successful argumentation requires claiming a maximum of authority within the school tradition in support of one’s position

Argumentation theory · Art · Epistemology · Exegesis · Fiqh · Hermeneutics · Islam · Linguistics · Literature · Object (grammar · Political science · Section (typography · Sharia · Sociology · Theology · Classics · Computer Science · Families in Therapy and Culture · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Philosophy

• Beyond Interest

  Open Access•Birnur Deniz•Religions•2025

  Add to list