Retreating From Vinter in Europe
Sacrificing Whole Life Prisoners To Save The Strasbourg Court
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12193137 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Pettigrew (0000-0001-7241-8244, Leeds Beckett University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 260-277 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0928-9569 • E-ISSN: 1571-8174 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15718174-02503004 |
| OpenAlex | W2742025544 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
In Vinter and Others v United Kingdom (2013) the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled that existing release mechanisms from a whole life prison sentence in England & Wales contravened Article 3 of the European Convention. Domestically, the defiant legal, and political, response declared the current law as sufficiently clear with no amendments to procedures, or the material governing those procedures, being necessary. In a reversal of the reasoning of Vinter, the Grand Chamber has been persuaded by that response. The ramifications of that most recent ruling, Hutchinson v United Kingdom (2017), are explored which, in the long term, threaten the court’s legitimacy and future
Convention · Human rights · Legitimacy · Life imprisonment · Political science · Politics · Prison · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|