Intersubjectivity and explanation in linguistics

A reply to Hinzen and van Lambalgen

Bibliographic Data

ID12197099
AuthorsArie Verhagen (0000-0003-2773-0989, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume19
Issue1
Publication date2008-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognitive Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0936-5907 • E-ISSN: 1613-3641
PublisherDe Gruyter Mouton (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/cog.2008.007
OpenAlexW2087653898
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited8

Let me start by saying that I very much appreciate both the effort that Hinzen and Van Lambalgen (hereafter, H&L) have put into commenting on Constructions of Intersubjectivity (hereafter, CoI), and their comments as such. It is important for all cognitive disciplines studying language that representatives from different schools of thought try to address each other's work, in terms of both results and foundations. We may not reach agreement as a result of a discussion, but it will still be helpful in clarifying matters for ourselves and for other interested scholars, and thus for the future development of our common field of study. This is true even if the divide is deep—which is the case here in a number of respects, as H&L indicate themselves

Cognition · Cognitive linguistics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Intersubjectivity · Linguistics · Sociology · Language and cultural evolution · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub