Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Caused motion’? The semantics of the English to-dative and the Dutch aan-dative

Bibliographic Data

ID12197572
AuthorsTimothy Colleman (0000-0002-3723-3807, Ghent University Hospital, corresponding author), Bernard De Clerck (0000-0001-7071-8040, Ghent University Hospital)
Year2009
Volume20
Issue1
Publication date2009-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognitive Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0936-5907 • E-ISSN: 1613-3641
PublisherDe Gruyter Mouton (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/cogl.2009.002
OpenAlexW1981158418
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited8

Both English and Dutch feature a variety of verbs of possessional transfer which display the phenomenon of dative alternation. They can either be used in a double object construction with unmarked NP theme and recipient objects or in a so-called “prepositional dative” construction in which only the theme is encoded as a bare NP object and the recipient is marked by a preposition. Within this context of dative alternation, this study zooms in on the English prepositional dative construction with to and the Dutch prepositional dative construction with aan (cognate with English on, German an). Existing analyses of these constructions hold widely different views on the semantic import of the prepositions used: some authors take the preposition to bring an element of ‘caused motion’ to the semantics of the construction, while others treat it as a grammaticalized marker of recipient function. We shall argue for an intermediate position: while the constructions with to and aan are not limited to events which involve an actual spatial transfer but cover a wide variety of ‘caused possession’ events, they are nevertheless subject to a number of constraints which can be traced back to the spatial semantics of English to and Dutch aan. These semantic constraints will be illustrated by means of corpus-based observations on the behaviour of a number of English and Dutch verbs in the respective dative alternations

Cognition · Cognitive linguistics · Dative case · Linguistics · Motion (physics · Programming language · Semantics (computer science · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar

    Florent Perek•Argument structure in usage-based…•2015

  • Mapping constructional spaces

    Open Access•Natalia Levshina, Dirk Geeraerts et al.•Linguistics•2013

  • Constructional semantics on the move

    Open Access•Timothy Colleman, Bernard De Clerck•Cognitive Linguistics•2011

  • The intertwining of differentiation and attraction as exemplified by the history of recipient transfer and benefactive alternations

    Open Access•Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Cognitive Linguistics•2020

  • Prepositional Aspect and the Algebra of Paths

    Open Access•Joost Zwarts•Linguistics and Philosophy•2005

  • Surface generalizations

    Open Access•Adele E Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Cognitive Linguistics•2002

  • The inherent semantics of argument structure

    Open Access•Adele Ε Goldberg•Cognitive Linguistics•1992

  • Heaviness vs. newness

    Open Access•J E Arnold, Anthony Losongco et al.•Language•2000

  • The English dative alternation

    Open Access•Malka Rappaport Hovav, Beth Levin•Journal of Linguistics•2008

  • Argument Marking in Ditransitive Alignment Types

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistic Discovery•2005

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0.27
Citation span2011 - 2020 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae