A Separate Law for Peacekeepers
The Clash between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12197817 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Neha Jain (0000-0001-5478-4101, Bangalore University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 239-254 |
| Publication date | 2005-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0938-5428 • E-ISSN: 1464-3596 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ejil/chi116 |
| OpenAlex | W2022920441 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Security Council Resolutions 1422 (2002), 1487 (2003) and 1497(2003), excluding the jurisdiction of the ICC, give rise to the fundamental issue of whether the legitimacy of an international institution such as the International Criminal Court may be eroded by an act of the Security Council, the political organ of the United Nations. This article analyses the legal validity of such resolutions within the framework of limitations that have been imposed upon the Council in international law. It discusses the relationship between the resolutions and the provisions of the Rome Statute, and concludes that their cumulative effect operates to modify the Rome Statute. It then deals with the effect of the illegality of these resolutions on the obligations of Member States of the UN, as well as on the ICC
Criminal court · Genocide · Institution · International law · Jurisdiction · Legitimacy · Peacekeeping · Political science · Politics · Security council · Sociology · Statute · Statute of limitations · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law
The Obligation to Prosecute Heads of State Under the Rome Statute of the Internatonal Criminal Court (Icc) and Customary International Law
A Human Rights Appraisal of the Limits to Judicial Independence for International Criminal Justice
Arguing with law
Uniting Against Impunity
II. Darfur, the Security Council, and the International Criminal Court
Prosecutorial Politics
United We Stand? The European Union's International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol
| Citations per year | 0.35 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2019 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |