Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Still Hazy after All These Years

The Interpretation of National Treatment in the Gatt/WTO Case-law on Tax Discrimination

Bibliographic Data

ID12197877
AuthorsHenrik Horn (0000-0003-3949-7272, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume15
Issue1
Pages39-69
Publication date2004-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0938-5428 • E-ISSN: 1464-3596
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ejil/15.1.39
OpenAlexW2095981746
LanguageEN
Citations received6

This article discusses the National Treatment (NT) obligation as applied in the GATT tax discrimination cases. The central thesis of the paper is that case-law has not clarified the interpretation of the terms in Article III. It appears that the reason for this failure is the lack of a conceptually coherent view of the role of the NT obligation. After summarizing the case-law on discriminatory taxation, this article lays out a theory of the role of NT in trade agreements, in order to shed light on appropriate interpretations of the terms appearing in Article III. We start from the notion that the GATT is an obligationally incomplete contract. This incompleteness invites beggar-thy-neighbour type behaviour, and the NT obligation is an imperfect remedy for such problems. We suggest that likeness/directly competitive or substitutable (DCS) should be determined 'in the market place', whereas the 'so as to afford protection' criterion is ultimately about the protection of expectations concerning the intent behind domestic regulations. But since intent usually cannot be determined directly, adjudicating bodies have to seek recourse to indirect evidence, as is frequently done in legal practice

Common law · Economics · Imperfect · Interpretation (philosophy · Law and economics · Obligation · Order (exchange · Political science · EU Law and Policy Analysis · Taxation and Legal Issues · World Trade Organization Law · Law · Philosophy

  • Practical obstacles and structural legal constraints in the adoption of ‘defensive’ policies

    Open Access•Giulia Claudia Leonelli•Legal Studies•2022

  • Learning to Dispute

    Open Access•Joseph A Conti•Law & Social Inquiry•2010

  • Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties

    Open Access•Nicholas DiMascio, Nicholas A DiMascio et al.•American Journal of International…•2008

  • The crisis of the WTO appellate body and the current trajectory of neoliberalism

    Open Access•Ralf Havertz•Frontiers in Political Science•2026

  • Standards of Non-Discrimination in International Economic Law

    Open Access•Nicolas F Diebold•International and Comparative Law…•2011

  • The Good Case

    Open Access•Joseph A Conti•Law & Society Review•2008

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae