A Non-Response to Weiler and Deshman
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12197977 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marko Milanovic (0000-0003-3880-6096, Advisory Board Company (United States), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 63-66 |
| Publication date | 2013-02-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0938-5428 • E-ISSN: 1464-3596 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ejil/cht016 |
| OpenAlex | W2121758018 |
| Language | EN |
This short article comments on Joseph Weiler and Abby Deshman's article on the debate whether there should be a wall of separation between the jus in bello and the jus ad bellum. Agreeing with Weiler and Deshman that the debate is quite polarized and at times coloured by a quasi-religious tone, this article reflects on some of the reasons for this intensity, including the fear among many international humanitarian lawyers that both the law and the profession are under near-existential threat
Epistemology · Existentialism · International law · Jus ad bellum · Linguistics · Political science · Sociology · Tone (literature · Use of force · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|